Solvency II reform reduces capital charges for senior securitizations from 30 January 2027, improving capital efficiency for insurers and influencing fixed income allocation decisions.1
What changes in Solvency II in 2027?
Solvency II reform changes how capital charges are calculated under the standard formula. It introduces seniority-based calibration and revises spread-risk factors, aligning capital requirements more closely with tranche risk. The update applies to EU/EEA insurers from 30 January 2027.1
What are the advantages of the Solvency II reform?
Solvency II reform reduces capital charges and improves capital efficiency for insurers. Lower spread-risk factors decrease capital requirements for senior exposures. At ~6.3-year WAL, AAA non-STS CLO charges fall from 78.7% to 17.0%.2 Reduced capital intensity increases allocation flexibility and supports more efficient portfolio construction.

For the full analysis and calculations, complete the below form to access the white paper.
Solvency II Reform White Paper

Our white paper, Solvency II Reform: A new era for CLO investments, breaks down the updated capital charges. It includes a side-by-side capital comparison (CLO tranches vs corporates at consistent WAL/duration) and practical implications for portfolio construction.
In this white paper, you’ll discover:
- What changes in Solvency II from January 2027, and how does seniority drive non-STS capital charges?
- How do senior non-STS CLO tranches compare with corporates, STS securitizations and covered bonds on a like-for-like WAL/duration basis?
- How can insurers translate the reform into portfolio decisions, balancing capital efficiency, yield and floating-rate ALM considerations?
Questions and answers
Numeric data in this FAQ is derived from: UBS Asset Management, ‘Solvency II Reform: A new era for CLO investments’, April 2026.
Risks
Risks
Capital outcomes under Solvency II may vary with regulation, modelling and market conditions. CLO investments involve market, liquidity and credit risks, and lower capital charges do not replace robust due diligence and governance.

