Market impact of Russian escalation in Ukraine

Market Updates 15 Mar 2022 5 min watch
Evan Brown
Head of Multi-Asset Strategy Investment Solutions

The current situation

We believe the war between Russia and Ukraine will be an active conflict for some time, with Russia’s goal being to first demilitarize Ukraine and then overthrow and install a new government.

This war is not going nearly as well as Putin expected. The Ukrainian military effort has been nothing short of heroic, and is fending off some advancements of the Russian army. But I think that Putin is not going to relent before aggressively pursuing those two goals.

The economic sanctions placed on Russia by the rest of the world have been very severe. The Russian economy essentially has been plunged into recession, or even depression. But for now, we don't think Putin is threatened enough domestically that he is going to suspend military operations or pursue a sustained ceasefire until he's tried to take over.

Scenarios

The scenarios from here can be characterized as negative, very negative and extremely negative.

The negative, which may be as good an outcome as we can expect from here is that at some point Putin gives up, and assuming that the war stays within Ukraine’s borders is, of course, negative from the perspective of Ukraine and the world. But that probably will lead to some stabilization in markets, provided there are no major additional sanctions placed by the west on Russia.

The more negative scenario is more intensified war, with weapons and planes reaching Russia, which angers Russia to the point that it cuts off natural gas. If the humanitarian situation becomes very bad, policymakers in the west may implement more soft sanctions, particularly on commodities.

The extremely negative scenario, the extreme tail risk, which we believe is very low probability but within the realm of possibility, is direct military NATO conflict. Neither the west nor Russia likely wants that. Russia could not hope to succeed in any direct military conflict with NATO given how stressed they are with Ukraine.

Economic effects/market positioning

The primary channel affected as of now is commodities. We all see oil prices above USD 100 and natural gas prices surging. Russia and Ukraine, are among the largest food producers in the world, so a cutoff in supply would aggravate inflation pressures globally.

Europe is the most vulnerable. Europe depends on Russian natural gas. If Russia were to cut off Europe’s natural gas supply, that would likely put Europe into a recession. We have seen the markets react accordingly with a rather large underperformance in European equities and the euro relative to the US dollar. An oil cutoff, whether that is Russia unilaterally doing so or more unified sanctions on Russians by the west could push oil prices much higher, as high as USD 180, at least temporarily.

We had a major inflation problem before the Russian invasion of Ukraine, globally. The US CPI print for February was nearly 8% headline inflation. The war is aggravating problems we already had. And it puts the central bankers in a very tough position because higher energy prices are going to weigh on growth.

Based on what we're seeing so far from the US Fed and the European Central Bank (ECB), is that even though this is a growth shock, they're still going to push ahead with tightening in response to inflation. Inflation expectations are rising and central bankers appear not to want to get into a situation where they have to tighten very aggressively and likely bring an end to the cycle.

We expect to see steady tightening from the Fed and the ECB. We expect the Fed to tighten 25 basis points per meeting, and if inflation fails to cool down, 50 basis points could be possible. Steady tightening in an environment where work is slowing down is usually not a great combination for the market.

The global economy before the Russia/Ukraine war, was very strong and rebounding. Private sector balance sheets continue to be in great shape. China is stimulating after a difficult year last year. So we believe global growth will be a little bit weaker as a result of the war, but as long as we don't get that extremely negative scenario, the economy should be able to withstand this shock and growth is highly likely on a global basis.

Stagflation is being thrown around as a scenario, which is high inflation and below trend growth. In Europe, it's a more difficult situation, but in the US in particular, we see this as an inflationary boom as opposed to stagflation.

The S&P 500 and MSCI World indexes are down roughly 10%. The track record of buying into political shocks that caused this kind of drawdown has been very strong. We have not had a 20% drawdown in the S&P outside of recession. There is a possibility of recession of course.

I think the underlying message is are we jumping to buy equities here? No, we're not because we do think these uncertainties are very real. We are concerned about those very negative and extremely negative scenarios which are within the probability distribution.

But if things do get worse, we will be looking to add. We are managing risk given the volatility and making sure that we do have some dry powder in case of there's some deterioration that we think creates an overshoot in financial markets. We still do have a value over growth tilt. In an environment with an inflationary boom, value should do better.

Energy and other commodities remain very good hedges. In case we do get that full cutoff of energy supply. There's plenty of volatility in the energy space. We have this risk, but we also have potential supply offsets such as the strategic petroleum reserves. But if oil prices do go down from here, it probably means the rest of our portfolios are doing better.

In this environment, we do still want to be underweight bonds, as inflationary pressures are still prominent and central banks are tightening. If we get a major geopolitical shock, bonds will likely rally even given these inflationary pressures, so that doesn't mean abandon US Treasuries, but it makes sense to be underweight.

In credit, we like US high yield. We believe the US economy is going to remain in good shape and credit spreads are widening, so within the credit space, that should be a reasonably good place to be. We are looking for opportunities in EM and Europe, but we want to wait a little bit before making moves on either of those.

In currencies, the US dollar is likely to continue to have upside, because the Fed is experiencing very high inflation and growth.

We think gold is attractive for a few reasons. One reason is because we have political uncertainty. Second, even as inflation pressures are rising and central banks are moving, are they necessarily moving fast enough at beginning to get inflation under control? I think there are major questions about that. Third, given the severe sanctions from the US on Russia, if you consider the perspective of other global reserve managers, there is an incentive to move away from US dollars as a reserve, and so we might see structurally more inflows into gold.

Questions

Related insights

Contact us

Fill in an inquiry form and leave your details – we’ll be back in touch.

Introducing our leadership team

Meet the members of the team responsible for UBS Asset Management’s strategic direction.

Find our offices

We’re closer than you think, find out here