Transitioning to a sustainable economy is fast becoming a priority. And as politicians seek to direct capital towards sustainable investments, environmental, social and governance (ESG) regulations directed at the financial sector – including asset management – are on the rise.
We take a closer look at the changes underway with a focus on the European Union (EU), a leader when it comes to sustainability regulation. In particular, we outline:
- The key drivers behind the need to re-shape our economy to one which is more sustainable
- The main initiatives transforming the regulatory landscape
- Challenges and limitations inherent within those policies and frameworks
- Next steps
If we want a reason for this shift in focus towards greater sustainability, we need look no further than the WEF Annual Global Risks Report and the dominance of environmental risks. Given the threat these pose to economic and financial stability, it is hardly surprising that policy makers are responding.
At a global level, international initiatives such as the UN Paris Agreement and the UN Agenda for Sustainable Development are providing countries with targets around which they can develop regulatory frameworks. Policy bodies, including The Financial Stability Task-force on Climate Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) and the UN Principles for Responsible Investment, are providing guidance and recommendations at a global level. Meanwhile, at a local level, regulators such as the UK Prudential Regulation Authority and the UK Financial Conduct Authority are exploring ways in which finance can address climate issues. The French Energy Transition for Green Growth law, is tackling similar considerations.
Perhaps the most ambitious efforts currently are to be found in the EU action plan on sustainable finance – a ten point plan aimed at:
- Re-orienting financial flows
- Managing financial risk
- Encouraging transparency and long-termism
Proposed legislation sets out new rules covering:
- A taxonomy – defining what a sustainable activity is
- Sustainability disclosures
- Sustainable benchmarks
- How firms integrate sustainability risks
A technical expert group (TEG), comprising industry experts, academics and civil servants is advising the European Commission on some of these topics. While much still needs be to done, progress is meaningful.
These initiatives are well intentioned but not without challenges. This is a transition which must occur over time, balancing ideological and pragmatic considerations.
The question of the taxonomy is a key case in point. The lack of a common framework and terminology for sustainable activities and investments is a longstanding concern. The intention of a standardized taxonomy is to achieve consistency and avoid 'greenwashing' – the practice of labelling an activity as sustainable when in fact it isn't. While the concept is welcome, ultimately, the way in which the taxonomy is calibrated will determine its usefulness. Too broad, and its use is limited, too narrow and it could unintentionally exclude companies or sectors which could, in fact, contribute to the transition towards a sustainable economy.
Greater levels of sustainability disclosure, both for financial firms and corporates, are generally seen as positive. Crucially though, globally accepted disclosure standards need to be developed, particularly given that asset managers invest globally, across companies of all sizes.
Navigating the ESG regulatory landscape
This standardization requirement feeds through to benchmarks. The EU is seeking to develop an EU 'quality assurance mark', initially in the form of an EU 'Climate Transition' benchmark and an EU 'Paris Aligned' benchmark. These will carry greater levels of disclosure, making it easier for consumers to compare products. Again, usability will determine success and at this stage concerns exist around the narrow scope of the Paris aligned methodology.
This brings us to the fourth area of focus, integration of sustainability risks. These fall into two parts: the way in which firms integrate sustainability into their investment and operational processes, and the way in which they integrate clients' sustainability preferences. For some firms, integrating sustainability risks and preferences will be mandatory - a move seen as broadly welcome. Any concerns center more around the need to keep any changes to the sales and distribution process simple and workable, given how soon they come after the MiFID II regime.
Looking ahead, it is clear that asset owners and asset managers will need to work together over time, not only to meet the requirements of the emerging financial frameworks legislation, but also to reap the financial and other benefits of sustainable investing.
As Julie Hudson, Global Head of ESG Research, UBS Investment Bank, recently said, "ESG will become "business as usual" at least partly because of a substantial body of regulation, which will act as an important catalyst, whatever anyone thinks about the detail, and however much doubt people may have about lists and taxonomies."
Proposed legislation sets out new rules covering:
A taxonomy - defining what a sustainable activity is
How firms integrate sustainability risks
Thank you for reading our summary, download the full whitepaper
Views and opinions expressed are presented for informational purposes only and are a reflection of UBS Asset Management’s best judgment at the time a report or other content was compiled. UBS specifically prohibits the redistribution or reproduction of this material in whole or in part without the prior written permission of UBS and UBS accepts no liability whatsoever for the actions of third parties in this respect. The information and opinions contained in the content of this webpage have been compiled or arrived at based upon information obtained from sources believed to be reliable and in good faith but no responsibility is accepted for any errors or omissions. All such information and opinions are subject to change without notice but any obligation to update or alter forward-looking statement as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise is disclaimed. Source for all data/charts, if not stated otherwise: UBS Asset Management.
Any market or investment views expressed are not intended to be investment research. Materials have not been prepared to address requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and are not subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination of investment research. The information contained in this webpage does not constitute a distribution, nor should it be considered a recommendation to purchase or sell any particular security or fund. The materials and content provided will not constitute investment advice and should not be relied upon as the basis for investment decisions. As individual situations may differ, clients should seek independent professional tax, legal, accounting or other specialist advisors as to the legal and tax implication of investing. Plan fiduciaries should determine whether an investment program is prudent in light of a plan's own circumstances and overall portfolio. A number of the comments in the content of this webpage are considered forward-looking statements. Actual future results, however, may vary materially. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Potential for profit is accompanied by possibility of loss.
© UBS 2020 The key symbol and UBS are among the registered and unregistered trademarks of UBS.