The associated economic activity and financing needs provide ample opportunities for investors who apply an ESG lens to distinguish between companies that are well-positioned for this transition and those that are not.
Already, fund flows and price action are transforming towards alignment with an ESG world, which will continue to assume importance as a long-term driver of relative returns, with an evolving, expanding scope of influence.
What is QIF?
The Quarterly Investment Forum (QIF) is an ongoing cross-investment team discussion and debate about the most relevant active risks in major markets and across asset classes and funds.
Each QIF is a mix of 'top down' and 'bottom up' perspectives, beginning with a 'top down' discussion of the major macroeconomic themes identified by the Asset Allocation Team. Each quarter, a rotating roster of portfolio managers present a 'bottom up' view of major active risks in their portfolios.
We have a unique depth and breadth of investment expertise across traditional and alternative asset classes in all regions globally. The QIF leverages that expertise through regular, structured communication between investment teams. The ultimate goal is to improve client outcomes.
3Q 2020 Quarterly Investment Forum highlights
COVID-19 another proof point for sustainable investing (SI)
The pandemic-induced tumult in risk assets should put to rest any lingering doubts over whether interest in ESG strategies could endure in the face of stressed market conditions. While the global fund industry suffered net outflows in the first half of 2020, particularly in the active space, SI-focused strategies continued to see net inflows. This demand resiliency is a testament to their performance during the volatility. ESG equity indexes generally posted superior results compared to their non-ESG peers, attributable to both an avoidance of fossil fuel companies and single-stock factors1.
The suite of features driving asset managers towards embracing sustainability integrated and focused initiatives has staying power. Institutional asset owners demand ESG considerations be taken into account in the investment process as a part of their fiduciary duty. Abiding by the swelling list of regulations pertaining to climate change and other objectives is a must. Investors are also seeking to minimize the reputational risk of being associated with companies that fall short on ESG, which tend to receive more negative news coverage. Most importantly, analyzing companies with an ESG analytical framework is increasingly viewed as an integral part of assessing longer-term investment risks that serve as a key determinant of performance.
How the regulatory ecosystem shapes market performance
The EU Taxonomy, a classification system for identifying environmentally sustainable economic activities, is among the highest-profile regulatory developments that promises to influence corporate decision-making and asset prices. Corporates and firms offering financial products in the EU will be required to disclose the amount of revenues/capital expenditures of their activities or portfolio holdings, respectively, that are Taxonomy-aligned; a Taxonomy score. Therefore, global asset managers with a European footprint are among the many companies that will be affected.
Going forward, this rubric can serve as a guide for targets that push corporations and investors towards activities and securities aligned with the achievement of desired environmental objectives. The Taxonomy is likely to bestow valuation premiums upon the handful of firms that have the best scores, fuel intra-industry dispersion based on relative scores, serve as an input to capital requirements thereby affecting the cost of capital, and, over time, provide sufficient data that helps passive ESG products gain more relevance. But in the near term, the Taxonomy provides significant opportunities for large, active asset managers that have the resources to do their own research and ascertain which firms have the desire and wherewithal to move their Taxonomy scores in the right direction as the regulations are phased in.
EU Taxonomy – What is it?
An EU classification system for environmentally sustainable economic activites
- Goal: Support six environmental objections
- Climate change mitigation
- Climate change adaptation
- Sustainable use and protection of water and marine resource
- Transition to circular economy, waste prevention and recycling
- Pollution prevention and control
- Protection of healthy ecosystems
- Eligibility and verification
- Tracking performance
The rise of regulation—cumulative number of global policy interventions
Exhibit 1, The rise of regulation-cumulative number of global policy interventions per year, is a line chart that shows the accumulating total of regulatory actions globally that are relevant to economic, social, and governance (ESG) factors, from 1972 to 2020, tracked by the UN's Principles for Responsible Investment. Across the world’s 50 largest economies, the PRI finds that there have been over 730 hard and soft law policy revisions, across some 500 policy instruments, which support, encourage or require investors to consider long-term value drivers, including ESG factors.
Putting ESG at the center of fundamental analysis
The expansion of ESG data coverage is helping to rapidly mainstream ESG integration and adoption among practitioners. ‘G’ has long been a contributor to equity market performance, but ‘E’ and ‘S’ are assuming greater influence in relative returns. A firm or industry’s ESG footprint is also contributing to factor delineation. Notably, questions over the true value of decades of oil reserves have turned many fossil fuel companies into value traps.
Shift in initiatives offers potential investment opportunities
As the world transitions toward the goals outlined by the Paris Agreement, there will be a shift in consumer behaviors, corporate decisions and dollars invested, which we believe will create a rich investment opportunity set both long and short that spans across decades.
"Shift in initiatives offers potential investment opportunities" contains two charts. The chart on the left tracks cumulative investments estimated to be needed based on current government projections and energy plans, to meet climate goals. They total an estimated USD 95 trillion to be spent between 2016 and 2050. The chart to the right tracks estimated needed investment required to meet the Paris Agreement's goal of maintaining global warming of less than 2 degrees centigrade by 2100. The total estimated cost is USD 110 trillion.
The amount of capital expenditures required to transition to a lower-carbon economy and meet the Paris Agreement targets is creating sustained disruption across sectors and long-term actionable themes linked to the Energy Transition Economy. Supranational accords, in concert with government policies as well as shifting consumer and investor demands, are providing the basis for market differentiation between companies with earnings leverage to environmentally friendly themes like electrification and those who do not, or whose business models are too slow in adapting.
The energy sector is at the core of an ”E”-centric analytical framework, but the pertinent ripple effects extend far beyond it. For instance, building the necessary green infrastructure to cap the rise in global temperatures entails a steep rise in demand for a variety of base and other metals that would leave those markets in undersupply, auguring for higher prices.
The green spending delta tied to the outcome of the November US election has never been greater, with the potential to materially sharpen focus on ESG as a catalyst for economic activity and asset market returns. A potential “Blue Wave” would likely unleash impactful spending on green initiatives, result in the US rejoining the Paris Agreement, a reset at the EPA, and geopolitical developments that contribute to lower oil prices.
Views and opinions expressed are presented for informational purposes only and are a reflection of UBS Asset Management’s best judgment at the time a report or other content was compiled. UBS specifically prohibits the redistribution or reproduction of this material in whole or in part without the prior written permission of UBS and UBS accepts no liability whatsoever for the actions of third parties in this respect. The information and opinions contained in the content of this webpage have been compiled or arrived at based upon information obtained from sources believed to be reliable and in good faith but no responsibility is accepted for any errors or omissions. All such information and opinions are subject to change without notice but any obligation to update or alter forward-looking statement as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise is disclaimed. Source for all data/charts, if not stated otherwise: UBS Asset Management.
Any market or investment views expressed are not intended to be investment research. Materials have not been prepared to address requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and are not subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination of investment research. The information contained in this webpage does not constitute a distribution, nor should it be considered a recommendation to purchase or sell any particular security or fund. The materials and content provided will not constitute investment advice and should not be relied upon as the basis for investment decisions. As individual situations may differ, clients should seek independent professional tax, legal, accounting or other specialist advisors as to the legal and tax implication of investing. Plan fiduciaries should determine whether an investment program is prudent in light of a plan's own circumstances and overall portfolio. A number of the comments in the content of this webpage are considered forward-looking statements. Actual future results, however, may vary materially. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Potential for profit is accompanied by possibility of loss.
© UBS 2020 The key symbol and UBS are among the registered and unregistered trademarks of UBS.