Policy clarity meets recession fears

Heading into year-end, private equity investors have significantly more policy clarity than in H1 and it is mostly good news. A rocky tariff rollout in the US has created some winners (companies with limited exports, primarily home-country exposure and services) and losers, but increased clarity has undeniably helped markets. Few private companies are showing obviously broken business models under the tariff regime, though more will likely emerge over time. Policymakers have recently delivered more good news for investors in the form of interest rate cuts. This will make borrowing cheaper and generating returns more straightforward, which could unlock additional exit activity. Global M&A activity has already reached USD 3 trillion in 9M25 and in another encouraging sign, IPO momentum appears to be accelerating. These have translated to improving distribution profiles for US buyout funds over the past several quarters. It will be difficult to disentangle the effects of rates, tariffs, and macro factors, but the exit environment may look brighter in the quarters ahead.

Recession fears still loom over global markets, which have seen exceptional asset price growth in recent years. While cost-related pressures have eased significantly (sometimes stabilizing at higher levels), sponsor and management attention has shifted to top-line growth, which has become more elusive, resulting in a forecast for negative quarterly fund returns in 2Q25. Companies across industries are finding it harder to raise prices and win new business as demand softens and both consumers and businesses seek value and trim costs. In the latter case, accelerating corporate layoffs are the latest sign of a ‘do more with less’ management mentality. Private companies with indispensable products and services are best positioned, while those with more tenuous value-add are struggling.

All of this has manifested in slower deployment by private equity funds, which recognize that a poor vintage in today’s market will be punished by investors more severely than in exuberant times when the raise-invest-raise cycle was running hotter. We observe funds deploying over 3-4 years, rather than the 2-3 years common in 2021-2022.  

Figure 1: Venture capital quarterly fund returns (%)

Venture capital quarterly fund returns have fluctuated significantly since 2021, with notable peaks and troughs, and recent years showing more stable performance.
Source: PitchBook; a Morningstar company, November 2025. (* denotes preliminary data). Net performance. Past performance is not a guarantee for future results.

This chart displays quarterly percentage returns for venture capital funds from 2021 to 2025, highlighting periods of high volatility followed by stabilization in recent quarters.

PE fundraising challenges

Fundraising remains challenging and US exceptionalism is on full display as Europe – and especially Asia – raises have struggled. Managers are setting more conservative targets and securing anchor and existing investor support well in advance of coming to market to avoid the negative signal associated with a struggling fundraise. First-close fee discounts are anecdotally more common, though still offered by a minority of funds. Top-performing managers continue to raise hard-capped funds, even in today’s market.

Venture capital all-in on artificial intelligence (AI)

The speed with which venture capital has funded AI-related companies is astonishing; just a few years ago, many investors believed that the VC model of the 2010s – grow users regardless of profitability, which is sure to follow later – had been sunset. Accounting for 63% of VC dollars invested in Q3, according to PitchBook, the story of venture capital is now one of translating AI progress into economic value. This may not be a straightforward proposition; consider, for example, the widely publicized MIT report stating that 95% of AI pilots fail to materialize into enterprise-level solutions.

VCs and investors, as ever, are motivated by the substantial potential return behind picking a market leader, possibly a generational return opportunity, given AI investment and impact numbers routinely quoted in trillions. Against this backdrop, investors appear more willing to participate in VC funds than they were a few years ago, despite exits and distributions remaining extremely hard to come by; at least the promise of up-rounds has returned in force, and vintages being raised today will have performance numbers unencumbered by the difficulties of 2022.

Figure 2: Private equity quarterly fund returns (%)

Private equity quarterly fund returns have shown significant volatility since 2021, with both sharp gains and declines, and recent quarters indicating more subdued performance.
Source: PitchBook, November 2025. (* denotes preliminary data). Net performance. Past performance is not a guarantee for future results.

This graph illustrates that private equity quarterly fund returns have fluctuated widely from 2021 to 2025, with periods of strong growth followed by stabilization in recent quarters.

Private equity sector performance outlook

Region

Region

red-bullet

Negative

red-bullet

Negative

light-gray-bullet

light-gray-bullet

dark-gray-bullet

Neutral 

dark-gray-bullet

Neutral 

 light-green-bullet

 light-green-bullet

dark-green-bullet

Positive

dark-green-bullet

Positive

Region

Americas

red-bullet

Negative

None

light-gray-bullet

None

dark-gray-bullet

Neutral 

None

 light-green-bullet

Venture capital, Growth equity, Buyouts

dark-green-bullet

Positive

Secondaries

Region

Europe

red-bullet

Negative

None

light-gray-bullet

None

dark-gray-bullet

Neutral 

Venture capital

 light-green-bullet

Growth equity, Buyouts

dark-green-bullet

Positive

Secondaries

Region

Asia

red-bullet

Negative

None

light-gray-bullet

None

dark-gray-bullet

Neutral 

Venture capital

 light-green-bullet

Growth equity, Buyouts

dark-green-bullet

Positive

Secondaries

Source: UBS Asset Management, Unified Global Alternatives (UGA), November 2025. Assessment informs top-down perspectives and strategy allocation. UGA will weigh the perceived relative attractiveness of these strategies using a scale of “underweight”, “neutral” and “overweight” ratings. These ratings are the opinion of UGA and may not necessarily provide an accurate reflection of the ultimate success or potential return of a given strategy. Past / expected performance is not a guarantee for future results. For illustrative purposes only.

M-002801

Related insights

We’re here to help

Contact us

For general inquiries with UBS Asset Management, fill in a form with your details and we’ll be back in touch.

Our leadership team

Our global leadership team is deep, diverse, and dedicated to our ethos of delivering investment excellence.

Find your local UBS office

As your expert global partner, we're closer than you think. Discover UBS's locations in your region.