Alternative Investments
Improving portfolio performance
The last 30 years have seen a steady growth and acceptance of alternative asset classes in institutional portfolios as investors seek diversified sources of income and return. These asset classes are sometimes called illiquid or private asset classes because one important characteristic is that they are not publicly listed in markets or no active dealer market exists. Past success of these asset classes, continuous innovation, and the ongoing low interest rate environment are the main drivers of this growth.
One characteristic of alternatives is that these assets classes are far more difficult to implement than traditional assets. Except for commodities, there are no low-cost index funds. They require higher levels of oversight and management than those offered in the public markets. Additionally, due to the closed-end nature of many of the investments, continuous search costs are necessary, thus requiring either sophisticated staffs to build and maintain these portfolios or high out-sourcing costs. Hedge funds require a high degree of active management both at the fund level and the total portfolio level.
How are investors adjusting their allocation to alternatives, and what are the results?
The most aggressive users are US university endowments, some with allocations as high as 60%. Yale University started this trend in the 1980s and is now over 75% invested in alternatives. It is the norm to see 40% to 60% allocations to alternatives in large endowments. Global family offices allocated an average 37% to a variety of alternatives according to a recent survey. Mega funds like large public pension plans and sovereign wealth funds typically allocate 15% to 25% to alternatives and are considering increasing their alternatives allocation.
Meeting return objectives in an environment where expected returns across publicly-traded risk assets are lower bolsters the appeal of expanding the investment horizon through the use of alternatives. Alternative Investments: Improving portfolio performance provides a comprehensive overview of the different asset classes investors can integrate into their portfolios more broadly – private equity, hedge funds, real estate, infrastructure, and commodities – and how to do so. We believe investors that add exposure to alternatives under the guidance of sophisticated managers will be able to improve the risk/reward profile of their portfolios through superior returns and diversification benefits.
Exhibit 2: Alternatives allocations by sample investors
Type | Type | Public pension plans | Public pension plans | Sovereign Wealth Fund | Sovereign Wealth Fund | University endowment | University endowment | Global family office | Global family office |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Type | Entity | Public pension plans | CalPERS | Sovereign Wealth Fund | GIC (Singapore) | University endowment | Yale University | Global family office | 121 surveyed |
Type | Size (in billions USD) | Public pension plans | 355.8 | Sovereign Wealth Fund | >100 | University endowment | 30 | Global family office | 1.6 (average) |
Type | Date | Public pension plans | March 2020 | Sovereign Wealth Fund | March 2020 | University endowment | June 2019 | Global family office | May 2020 |
Type | Allocation (%) | Public pension plans | - | Sovereign Wealth Fund | - | University endowment | - | Global family office | - |
Type | Equities | Public pension plans | 49 | Sovereign Wealth Fund | 30 | University endowment | 17 | Global family office | 29 |
Type | Fixed income & Cash | Public pension plans | 31 | Sovereign Wealth Fund | 50 | University endowment | 7 | Global family office | 30 |
Type | Other | Public pension plans | - | Sovereign Wealth Fund | - | University endowment | - | Global family office | 6 |
Type | Alternatives | Public pension plans | - | Sovereign Wealth Fund | - | University endowment | - | Global family office | - |
Type | Private equity | Public pension plans | 8 | Sovereign Wealth Fund | 13 | University endowment | 38 | Global family office | 16 |
Type | Infrastructure | Public pension plans | - | Sovereign Wealth Fund | - | University endowment | - | Global family office | - |
Type | Real estate/real assets | Public pension plans | 13 | Sovereign Wealth Fund | 7 | University endowment | 10 | Global family office | 14 |
Type | Natural resources | Public pension plans | - | Sovereign Wealth Fund | - | University endowment | 6 | Global family office | - |
Type | Hedge funds | Public pension plans | - | Sovereign Wealth Fund | - | University endowment | 23 | Global family office | 5 |
Type | Commodities | Public pension plans | - | Sovereign Wealth Fund | - | University endowment | - | Global family office | - |
Type | Alternatives as % of portfolio | Public pension plans | 21 | Sovereign Wealth Fund | 20 | University endowment | 77 | Global family office | 35 |
Meeting return objectives in an environment where expected returns across publicly-traded risk assets are lower bolsters the appeal of expanding the investment horizon through the use of alternatives. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the different asset classes investors can integrate into their portfolios more broadly – private equity, hedge funds, real estate, infrastructure, and commodities – and how to do so. We believe investors that add exposure to alternatives under the guidance of sophisticated managers will be able to improve the risk/reward profile of their portfolios through superior returns and diversification benefits.
Read more
Asset Management services and solutions in your location
Please select your region
Important legal information
To proceed, please confirm that you are a professional client / qualified / institutional investor or US retail clients and investors.
Views and opinions expressed are presented for informational purposes only and are a reflection of UBS Asset Management’s best judgment at the time a report or other content was compiled. UBS specifically prohibits the redistribution or reproduction of this material in whole or in part without the prior written permission of UBS and UBS accepts no liability whatsoever for the actions of third parties in this respect. The information and opinions contained in the content of this webpage have been compiled or arrived at based upon information obtained from sources believed to be reliable and in good faith but no responsibility is accepted for any errors or omissions. All such information and opinions are subject to change without notice but any obligation to update or alter forward-looking statement as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise is disclaimed. Source for all data/charts, if not stated otherwise: UBS Asset Management.
Any market or investment views expressed are not intended to be investment research. Materials have not been prepared to address requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and are not subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination of investment research. The information contained in this webpage does not constitute a distribution, nor should it be considered a recommendation to purchase or sell any particular security or fund. The materials and content provided will not constitute investment advice and should not be relied upon as the basis for investment decisions. As individual situations may differ, clients should seek independent professional tax, legal, accounting or other specialist advisors as to the legal and tax implication of investing. Plan fiduciaries should determine whether an investment program is prudent in light of a plan's own circumstances and overall portfolio. A number of the comments in the content of this webpage are considered forward-looking statements. Actual future results, however, may vary materially. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Potential for profit is accompanied by possibility of loss.
© UBS 2021 The key symbol and UBS are among the registered and unregistered trademarks of UBS.
