China multi asset investing strategy Q&A (December 2020)

China’s superior fiscal and monetary capacity to respond to shocks along with its first-in, first-out status on the global pandemic have allowed its domestic equities to hold up better in 2020 compared to emerging market equities as a whole.

We believe this relative resilience will be sustained, with Beijing indicating a commitment to prioritize employment and relax the deleveraging campaign.

Joe Biden was declared the winner of the US presidential race, and is likely to take office with a Republican Senate. For its implication to US-China relationship, in our view, Biden’s approach towards China is poised to be more predictable, but still confrontational. 

There will be less emphasis on the balance of trade and a gradual move away from tariffs, but technology will serve as a focal point in the continuing deterioration of US-China relations. 

Unlike President Trump, Biden may choose to build multilateral coalitions with American allies to address China on matters pertaining to trade, technology, human rights, and the environment. 

All in all, we take a view that, while the geopolitical risk will likely linger in the background, a Biden administration would be supportive to Chinese risk assets in the shorter term.

We are long risk now and have an overweight in equities, so our cash levels are quite low currently, particularly compared to Q2 2020. 

We have also kept a meaningful position in onshore fixed income, that’s because we see it as a risk off asset that currently offers good carry.

Source: UBS Asset Management
* H-shares refer to Chinese companies listed in Hong Kong
** A-share refer to onshore equities which might include B-shares.
*** Only applicable to the offshore bonds denominated in USD
The chart contains month end asset allocation breakdown only. This information should not be considered as a recommendation to purchase or sell any security.
Data as at 31 October, 2020

Our onshore China fixed income position is in central government bonds (CGBs) and policy bank bonds (PBBs) so we are quite cautious with the position that we take since these are some of the most liquid parts of the onshore China bond market.

FTSE Russell is the third major index provider to include onshore China bonds in their indices. 

It is not such a significant step on its own, but it continues the trend of index inclusion and attracts flow from international investors, which we expect to see play out in the coming years.

We hold a constructive view on RMB appreciation. Hence, we no longer hedge our positions and we are comfortable with the RMB positions gained through our onshore exposures.

We have a large position in the China A share space, but we see that the China H space looks attractive too. China A shares have rallied quite a lot, opening up quite a premium vs. the China H share market. We believe there is potential for China H shares to rise in the coming months and then close the premium gap.

Source: * A-shares refer to onshore equities which might include B-shares. ** H-shares refer to Chinese companies listed in Hong Kong.
UBS Asset Management. Data as at 31 October, 2020. Allocation and holdings are subject to change.

Generally, we have a preference for credits over CNY bonds, and we prefer high yield over investment grade because we still like the fundamentals in the space and the market has priced in a higher implied default risk, and particularly in the property space where we hold companies that have stronger balance sheet and solid cash flows.

Default cycles are part of the maturing China onshore bond market and are in a longer term perspective a healthy development for pricing and stability.

In a historical perspective, default cycles are nothing new. The defaults seen recently have been in the local state-owned enterprise space, where we have seen defaults in local SOEs since 2014 and an uptick in the cycle throughout 2015-2017, indicating a gradual shift towards a more reflective market pricing.

Most importantly, within the onshore bond space for CAO, we only hold rates bonds - CGBs and PBBs - which are government-backed and seen as safe assets.

China is clearly on a strong V-shaped recovery track and we expect the economy to return to on-trend growth in the next six-to-12 months. We have a slight risk on mode going into November to position for a potential Biden win in the US presidential election. 

In general, we prefer credits and equity over government bonds. We are holding more onshore equities compared to historical average given the easing stance of monetary policy and growing international demand due to index inclusion. 

We have increased our credits exposure by funding out from our onshore government bonds while we still hold a meaningful amount to balance risk.

Source: UBS Asset Management.
Note: This information should not be considered as a recommendation to purchase or sell any security.

We have a preference on HY over IG considering the attractive yield and implied default risk. We hold a constructive view on RMB appreciation and we are comfortable with the RMB positions gained through our onshore exposures.

Unlike President Trump, Biden may choose to build multilateral coalitions with American allies to address China on matters pertaining to trade, technology, human rights, and the environment.

All in all, we take a view that, while the geopolitical risk will likely linger in the background, a Biden administration would be supportive to Chinese risk assets in the shorter term.

In addition to active bets between equity and bonds, we emphasis the importance of allocating capital between the onshore and offshore assets to benefit from different catalysts and investor behavior.