US-China tech war The dueling threats to US, China tech

Escalating US-China tensions as the November election nears are likely to foster volatility, with measures taken against Chinese technology a focal point.

05 Aug 2020

US-China tech war Key points to note

  • Escalating US-China tensions as the November election nears are likely to foster volatility, with measures taken against Chinese technology a focal point.
  • An abrupt US-China tech decoupling is unlikely in the near term, but a longer term likelihood.
  • Investors underestimate domestic policy support for Chinese tech as well as policy risks to US tech.
  • An overly sanguine outlook for US tech stocks is indicative of the broader risks to its domestic equities, which reinforces our preference for global equities relative to the US.

US-China tech war Disruption over coming months to provide opportunities in Chinese tech stocks

The drumbeat of US-China tensions is likely to crescendo in the coming months, with the relationship devolving across geopolitical, diplomatic and economic fronts. From a market perspective, Chinese technology stocks could face significant volatility given escalating conflicts between the two sides. Meanwhile, conventional wisdom holds that the dominant market position and earnings power of US technology heavyweights are unassailable.

However, investors should not lose sight of the big picture. We believe that any disruption over coming months could provide pockets of opportunity in Chinese technology stocks, which enjoy supportive underlying trends that include a deep, captive domestic base and a government committed to the development of technology champions as well as macroeconomic stability.

In our opinion, there are two overarching questions that investors must keep at the forefront of their minds in assessing the degree and nature of their preferred exposure to technology:

  • What is the potential for a disruptive acceleration in US-China tech decoupling as the relationship between the two countries deteriorates?
  • How much will global as well as domestic tax and regulatory shifts threaten to undermine the dominant position of US tech firms?

We believe that US-China tech decoupling is a longer-term story, and the prospect of an abrupt fracturing in this relationship does not appear imminent.

And in a world in which COVID-19 has exacerbated and laid bare the hardships of victims of economic inequality, politicians in the US and abroad may be incentivized to rein in the financial benefits accruing to the more profitable and monopolistic entities, the US tech giants.

Exhibit 1: US-China tensions more priced in for Chinese stocks

Source: UBS Asset Management, Bloomberg. Data as of 28 July 2020.

Nonetheless, a degree of portfolio protection is also prudent in light of the growing rifts between the world’s two largest economies in the coming months. As such, we remain long the US dollar relative to cyclical Asian currencies, like the Taiwanese dollar and Korean won, which would likely come under acute pressure should tensions between the two sides – trade or otherwise – flare up.

US/China tech war No “sudden stop” moment of US/China tech decoupling

There is bipartisan support in the US for using all means necessary – legislation, executive orders and soft power – to limit China’s ascension in global technology and allay national security concerns surrounding the potential deployment of Chinese communications technology in the US and other parts of the developed world.

But the most at-risk segments of the Chinese market seem priced to reflect some of these downside risks, while evidence from the trade dispute implies a full clampdown on the Chinese technology sector is not in the best interest of the US.

Chinese stocks still bear scars from the trade war that preceded the Phase 1 agreement signed in early 2020, judging by the gap in returns between Chinese stocks with heavy exposure to the US and American firms that generate a substantial share of revenues from the world’s second-largest economy since the 2016 US election. All of the relative underperformance of broad proxies for Chinese tech vs. their US peers occurred during a six-month span in 2018 when the trade conflict began.

A détente on trade was reached before the US imposed tariffs on imports of popular consumer goods from China, indicative of the US administration’s reluctance to introduce measures that are too visible to consumers or too disruptive to some of the biggest US technology companies.

Exhibit 2: 2018 trade war initiation is all that separates Chinese tech from the Nasdaq 100

Source: UBS Asset Management, Bloomberg. Data as of 28 July 2020. Red box indicates 2018 launch of US tariffs on Chinese imports.

Turning from a trade war to a tech-centric war would accentuate those pressure points. For instance, a blanket ban on major Chinese smart phone producers would see US technology excluded from roughly 50% of global annual sales in that market.

Huawei has garnered the most attention and action from the US government. No other Chinese firm involved in physical technology has the same stature on the global stage, and its 5G ambitions pose untenable security challenges. This unique set of circumstances suggests extrapolating directly from the US-Huawei relationship to the rest of the Chinese tech ecosystem is not an appropriate base scenario, and closer to a worst case outcome. The rollout of additional export controls may introduce more complications for both US and Chinese technology companies, but are likely to be sufficiently porous in the short term rather than an inviolable supply chain severance.

The scale of the mutually assured damage to both US and Chinese companies that would follow a “sudden stop” moment of tech decoupling suggests the US government will instead continue to gradually refine the mechanisms by which it restricts China’s access to technology.

US/China tech war Chinese tech leaders have much more concentrated domestic exposure than the FANG stocks

As is the case with leading US firms, a more expansive definition than the IT sector is required to capture Chinese leaders who make extensive use of technology or online platforms but fall in the communication services or consumer discretionary sectors.

This broader group of Chinese tech leaders – Tencent, Alibaba, Baidu, Meituan-Dianping, and – have much more concentrated domestic exposure than the FANG stocks, Microsoft, or Apple in the US, and have a much larger weighting in MSCI China than the traditional IT sector. These companies are important sources of demand for high-tech products produced around the world rather than a meaningful part of global supply chains.

Despite their size and pervasive reach, Chinese technology heavyweights are not frequently at odds with the domestic authorities. The propensity for cooperative, symbiotic relationships between industry titans and the state entails that dominant positions are a feature, not a bug. This relatively insular position and access to a significant, captive domestic market may prove a stabilizing force for China’s biggest companies, as there are fewer regulatory points of conflict and a ruling class whose commitment to macroeconomic stabilization and the success of technology is resolute.

Beijing has also shown an increasing willingness to underwrite activity in the traditional IT sector in a bid for eventual import substitution (Made in China 2025, a state-led industrial policy that seeks to make China dominant in global high-tech manufacturing), enhancing this structural trend. Money is no panacea in a worst-case scenario that includes the loss of foundational US technologies, but does help reduce the ramifications of any cyclicality in Chinese tech and offset the adverse impacts of restrictive US policies. For instance, Huawei was able to grow revenues at a double digit pace year-on-year in the first half of 2020 thanks to its leading position in the domestic smartphone market and demand from state-owned Chinese enterprises across a variety of business units.

US-China tech war Global presence, global stakeholders: Policy risks to US tech

The ability of US tech heavyweights to post persistently elevated profitability or add to their commanding global footprints will be challenged by politicians who question aspects of their business models that provide this dominant market position and how little their tax burden is proportional to their size and success.

A bipartisan consensus of US politicians favors more scrutiny of domestic technology giants, which have come under fire over low effective tax rates, tolerance of disinformation, privacy concerns and anti-competitive behavior.

Democrats would likely be more aggressive and thorough in redressing the perceived societal and economic ills linked to the sector. Current polling and prediction markets suggest that if the November US election were held today, the expectation would be for Democratic candidate Joe Biden to prevail, with the Democrats retaining control of the House of Representatives while also taking the Senate. Biden’s plan calls for a tax on minimum book income and a higher rate levied on profits associated with intangible assets shifted to a lower-tax foreign locale. US tech multinationals would be among the most negatively affected by these measures. Foreign governments are also likely to push for taxes as well, based on these firms’ substantial international presences.

Exhibit 3: Earnings impact from Biden proposed tax plan...

Source: UBS Investment Research, Equity Strategy.

While any antitrust campaigns may take years to produce tangible actions, any traction on this issue could cause investors to question whether the longer-term earnings power of many leading companies would be sustainable under current valuations. Conversely, these firms may prove relatively immune from political breakup pressures under the pretense that they are domestic champions integral to maintaining US technological superiority.

What’s in the price?

The pandemic has likely accelerated technology adoption and pulled forward digitization. This thesis has been embraced much more by investors in US IT stocks compared to their Chinese peers, judging by the relatively muted earnings outperformance vs. the benchmark expected for the latter over the next 12 months.

Chinese IT stocks have typically traded at a meaningful premium to their US rivals on a forward price to earnings basis, though this has materially ebbed since the start of the trade war in 2018.

Exhibit 4: Chinese tech returns, earnings dwarf US

Source: UBS-AM, Bloomberg. Data as of 27 July 2020.

Exhibit 5: US tech valuation premium elevated vs. benchmark

Source: UBS Asset Management, Bloomberg. Data as of 27 July 2020.

Higher valuations are also indicative of the past cycle’s trend in earnings growth, with Chinese IT handily outstripping its US counterpart. And compared to other Chinese equities, tech stocks aren’t at historically stretched levels, in stark contrast to the setup stateside. The MSCI USA IT index has a multiple that’s two standard deviations above that of the MSCI USA based on the past decade of observations; the comparable premium for MSCI China IT is only modestly above average. Pure IT is a relatively limited part of the MSCI China Index, but this differential in the relative valuation premium also generally holds for some of the biggest companies in these markets, like Alibaba and Tencent in China and Amazon and Microsoft in the US.

The US tech sector is the preeminent source of software stocks globally, which account for one-third of the index and can exhibit defensive characteristics during periods of economic stress. China’s tech sector is more physically oriented, with nearly 60% weighted in technology hardware and equipment. Semis account for just more than one-fifth of the tech sector in China, and a little less than that level in the US. This industry composition would also tend to work more in China’s favor at the onset of an early cycle environment.

US-China tech war Conclusion

Based on both US-China tensions and valuations relative to benchmark, there is more good news priced into American stocks – even as a potential turning point on taxation and regulation looms. That sets a high bar that may lead to more scope for disappointment should the underlying fundamentals show any signs of deterioration.

A preference for Chinese equities is reflective of our asset allocation, which sees more value in early-cycle trades and favors exposures outside the US. The upcoming November election is just one example of the broader risks facing US risk assets. In addition, the US’s poor ability to control the COVID-19 virus relative to other advanced economies, ensuing implications for the timing as well as durability of the economic recovery, and step-down in fiscal support leave us broadly negative on the US dollar and more positive on global risk assets.

Asset class attractiveness

The chart below shows the views of our Asset Allocation team on overall asset class attractiveness, as well as the relative attractiveness within equities, fixed income and currencies, as of 30 July 2020.

Singapore Retail Investors


This website is not intended for and should not be accessed by persons located or resident in any jurisdiction where (by reason of that person's nationality, domicile, residence or otherwise) the publication or availability of this website is prohibited or contrary to local law or regulation or would subject any UBS entity to any registration or licensing requirements in such jurisdictions. It is your responsibility to be aware of, to obtain all relevant regulatory approvals, licenses, verifications and/or registrations under, and to observe all applicable laws and regulations of any relevant jurisdiction in connection with your entrance to this website. Each investment product and service referred to on this website is intended to be made available only to residents in Singapore.

UBS reserves the right to change, modify, add or remove content on the website as well as these terms at any time for any reason without notice. Such changes shall be effective immediately upon posting. You acknowledge that by accessing our website after we have posted changes to these terms, you are agreeing to these terms as modified.

The materials on this Website are distributed by UBS Asset Management (Singapore) Ltd (company registration number: 199308367C), which is licensed by Monetary Authority of Singapore ("MAS") in Singapore pursuant to the Securities and Futures Act (Chapter 289 of Singapore). UBS Asset Management (Singapore) Ltd is part of the Asset Management business division of UBS Group AG. UBS Asset Management (Singapore) Ltd together with UBS Group AG and its group companies shall collectively be referred to as "UBS".

The information contained in this Website has been prepared and is intended for general circulation. The information does not constitute advice and does not take into account the specific investment objectives, financial situation, or particular needs of any particular person. The investment services or products referred to in this Website may not be suitable for all investors. UBS recommends that you independently evaluate particular investments and strategies and seek independent advice from a financial adviser regarding the suitability of such investment products, taking into account your specific investment objectives, financial situation and particular needs, before making a commitment to purchase any investment products. Investment involves risks. You should be aware that investments may increase or decrease in value and that past performance is not indicative of future performance.

The information contained in this Website is not an offer to buy or sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any investment product or to participate in any particular trading strategy. UBS, its officers and/or employees may have interests in any of the investment products referred to on this Website by acting in various roles. UBS, its officers and/or employees may receive fees, commissions or other benefits for acting in those capacities. In addition, UBS, its officers and/or employees may buy or sell investment products as principal or agent and may effect transactions which are not consistent with the information set out in this Website.

You fully understand and agree that, by making available this Website, UBS should not be construed as making: (a) any endorsement of any investment product referred to in this Website; (b) any representation that UBS has performed any due diligence on any investment product referred to in this Website; or (c) any representation that the information in this Website is complete, accurate, clear, fair and not misleading. The use or reliance on any such information contained in this Website is at your own risk and any losses which may be suffered as a result of you entering into any investment are for your account and UBS shall not be liable for any losses arising from or incurred by you in connection therewith. UBS is not responsible or liable for the accuracy and completeness of any such information or the performance or outcome of any investment made by you after receipt of such information, irrespective of whether such information was provided at your request.

Using, copying, redistributing or republishing any part of this Website without prior written permission from UBS is prohibited. Any statements made regarding investment performance objectives, risk and/or return targets shall not constitute a representation or warranty that such objectives or expectations will be achieved or risks are fully disclosed. The information and opinions contained in this Website is based upon information obtained from sources believed to be reliable and in good faith but no responsibility is accepted for any misrepresentation, errors or omissions. All such information and opinions are subject to change without notice. A number of comments in this Website are based on current expectations and are considered “forward-looking statements”. Actual future results may prove to be different from expectations and any unforeseen risk or event may arise in the future. The opinions expressed are a reflection of UBS’s judgment at the time this document is compiled and any obligation to update or alter forward-looking statements as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise is disclaimed.

UBS does not hold out any of its officers and/or employees as having any authority to advise you, and UBS does not purport to advise you on any investment product. Any investment will be made at your sole risk and UBS is not and shall not, in any manner, be liable or responsible for the consequences of any investment.

This Website and its contents are provided on an “as is” and “as available” basis. UBS does not warrant: (a) the accuracy, timeliness, adequacy commercial value or completeness of this Website or its contents, and expressly disclaims any liability for errors, delays or omissions in the contents, or for any action taken in reliance on the contents; (b) that your use of and/or access to this Website or its contents, will be uninterrupted, timely, secure or free from errors or that any identified defect will be corrected; (c) that this Website or any content will meet your requirements or are free from any virus or other malicious, destructive or corrupting code, agent, program or macros; (d) that any information, instructions or communications posted or transmitted by you through this Website is secure and cannot be accessed by unauthorised third parties; and (e) that use of the contents in this Website by you will not infringe the rights of any third parties. No warranty of any kind, implied, express or statutory, including but not limited to the warranties of non-infringement of third party rights, title, merchantability, satisfactory quality or fitness for a particular purpose and freedom from computer virus or other malicious, destructive or corrupting code, agent, program or macros, is given in conjunction with this Website.

You hereby agree to indemnify UBS and any of its officers, employees or agents against, and to keep UBS and any of its officers, employees or agents harmless from, any claims (actual and threatened), settlement sums, liability, loss, damages, costs (including solicitor and client costs and expenses (legal or otherwise)), charges, expenses, actions, proceedings, whether foreseeable or not which we may sustain, suffer or incur, directly or indirectly out of or in the course of or in connection with any the following: (a) any use of this Website or the contents by you, or any part thereof; (b) UBS having made available the Website; (c) any breach of these Terms by you, however arising; or (d) any negligence, act or omission, wilful default, unlawful act, fraud and/or misconduct on your part or violation of any rights of another person or entity by you.

The funds referred to in this Website have been authorised or recognised by the MAS for sale to the public in Singapore (the “Funds”). Copies of the registered Singapore prospectuses ("Prospectuses") referred to in this Website have been lodged with and registered by the MAS. The MAS assumes no responsibility for the contents of the Prospectuses. The registration of the Prospectuses by the MAS does not imply that the SFA or any other legal or regulatory requirements have been complied with.

MAS registration is not a recommendation or endorsement of a Fund nor does it guarantee the commercial merits or performance of such Fund. It does not mean that a Fund is suitable for all investors nor is it an endorsement of its suitability for any particular investor or class of investors. UBS Asset Management (Singapore) Ltd has been appointed as the representative for the Funds in Singapore for the purposes of performing administrative and other related functions relating to the offer of Shares under Section 287 of the Securities and Futures Act, Chapter 289 of Singapore (the "SFA") and such other functions as the MAS may prescribe.

You may not assign your rights under the Terms without our prior written consent. UBS Asset Management (Singapore) Ltd may assign our rights under the Terms to any third party.

No person or entity who is not a party to the Terms shall have any right under the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act, Chapter 53B of Singapore or other similar laws to enforce any term of the Terms regardless of whether such person or entity has been identified by name, as a member of a class or as answering a particular description. For the avoidance of doubt, this shall not affect the rights of any permitted assignee or transferee of the Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by, and shall be construed in accordance with, the laws of Singapore. The courts of Singapore shall have exclusive jurisdiction to hear and determine any suit, action or proceeding, and to settle any disputes, which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms and, for such purposes, you agree to submit  to the jurisdiction of the courts of Singapore. Each party hereby waives any objection which it might at any time have to the courts of Singapore being nominated as the forum to hear and determine any proceedings and to settle any disputes and agrees not to claim that the courts of Singapore are not a convenient or appropriate forum.

© UBS 2021 - the key symbol and UBS are among the registered and unregistered trademarks of UBS. All rights reserved.


More insights