Deleveraging & China's real estate sector

How has deleveraging impacted China's residential real estate sector and what opportunities has it created?

15 Mar 2018

In late-2016, the Chinese government launched its deleveraging campaign to get serious about debt in the financial system. Since China's real estate sector took approximately 42% of total financing in the economy in 2016, according to the UK-based Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors, it's a prime target for the deleveraging campaign.

Part of the build-up of debt in the real estate sector has been down to the government because it has boosted economic growth by channeling loans to developers, allowing shadow bank financing to the sector, and periodically removing purchase restrictions to boost sales and investment.

But the situation is different now that China's government is focused on sustainability. Developers must become more competitive, re-evaluate their business models, use resources more efficiently, and meet development targets.

Major changes introduced in the past two years include restrictions on developer bond issues, curbs on financing via wealth management products, strict qualification criteria to enter land auctions, tough oversight over bank lending, and huge fines for bank sector loan officers if they don't comply with new rules.

These policy changes have driven record levels of sector M&A. Smaller developers have been pushed out of the market and highly leveraged firms have liquidated their land assets and projects, resulting in M&A worth USD 108.5 billion in 2017, up 112% y-o-y, according to data compiled by Pricewaterhouse Coopers.

Source: PWC, 2018

Large-scale developers have used the opportunity - and bumper 2016 sales revenues - to expand market share, pay down debt and focus on profitability. Market concentration has increased, with the top 10 developers by sales in 2017 accounting for 24% of total sales, compared with 10.1% in 2010.

But China's deleveraging drive is by no means over. Policy statements following the October 2017 National Party Congress reaffirm the government's commitment, and the industry will continue to face financing pressure in the coming years.

In this environment, developers who have focused on improving operations, diversified nationally, and boosted their land reserves through M&A, are emerging as sector leaders and look well set to expand in the future.

Canada Asset Management

Views and opinions expressed are presented for informational purposes only and are a reflection of UBS Asset Management’s best judgment at the time a report was compiled, and any obligation to update or alter forward-looking statement as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise is disclaimed. Commentary is provided at a macro level and is not with reference to any investment strategy, product or fund offered by UBS Asset Management and is provided in Canada generally pursuant to the registration exemption provided for in Section 8.25(2) of National Instrument 31-103 and in Ontario pursuant to Section 34 of the Securities Act (Ontario) and does not purport to be tailored to the needs of the person or company receiving the advice.. The information contained in the materials should not be considered a recommendation to purchase or sell any particular security. The materials and content provided will not constitute investment advice and should not be relied upon as the basis for investment decisions. As individual situations may differ, clients should seek independent professional tax, legal, accounting or other specialist advisors as to the legal and tax implication of investing. Plan fiduciaries should determine whether an investment program is prudent in light of a plan's own circumstances and overall portfolio. UBS Asset Management services offered to Canadian persons are provided by UBS Asset Management (Canada) Inc., a Nova Scotia corporation. UBS Asset Management (Canada) Inc. is an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of UBS AG and is registered as a portfolio manager and exempt market dealer (in all provinces of Canada), commodity trading manager (Ontario), adviser – commodity futures (Manitoba) and investment fund manager (Ontario, Quebec and Newfoundland), all pursuant to Canadian securities law. Materials may include forward-looking statements. Actual future results, however, may prove to be different from expectations. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Potential for profit is accompanied by possibility of loss.

Please confirm you are a Canada resident to proceed.

Please select at least 1 checkbox