- The US-China trade war has now escalated enough that our core views on economic growth stabilization are being challenged.
- We remain of the view that the US and global economies can avoid recession, but the risks to this view have risen in recent months. The ability of the economy to withstand further shocks is limited.
- Our key signposts now include US initial jobless claims and consumer confidence.
- We maintain a cautious stance on global equities and are neutral fixed income. The dollar should weaken as the US economy catches down to the rest of the world and Fed eases policy further.
In Investment Solutions, we take a theme-based approach to our multi-asset portfolios. We set out core views or hypotheses about the global economy and express these via sets of cross-asset trade ideas. Our themes are designed to be orthogonal; they should capture different elements of the global macro and market environment. We have now come to an interesting juncture in which one of our themes, the growing role of geopolitics and protectionism in markets, has become so strong that it is challenging our confidence in a second theme, that global growth will ultimately stabilize around its trend rate. Put simply, the US-China trade war is now a quite legitimate threat to the global and US economic expansion.
Geopolitics now a primary driver of markets
While geopolitical developments have always played a role in economies and markets, their scale and impact has been steadily rising since the 2008 financial crisis. One way to quantify this is the Global Economic Policy Uncertainty Index, which has reached record highs, and is trending higher (see Exhibit 1 on the next page).
Traditionally, medium- to long-term investors have been able to compartmentalize the 'noise' of geopolitics and focus instead on the 'signal' of underlying economic fundamentals. However, the noise of trade escalation is arguably now the signal. Tariff policy has sent global manufacturing into contraction while business investment has declined sharply. The global economy continues to decelerate and is now quite vulnerable to another shock or miscalculation.
Exhibit 1: Global economic policy uncertainty trending higher
Service sector resilience is key
If there is some good news, it is that developed market economies are much more services-driven than manufacturing-driven versus history. Manufacturing today makes up only about 11% of the US GDP and 8.5% of US employment. And the services sector has, up to now, been rather resilient amid the deterioration in the goods-producing sector (Exhibit 2). But we are beginning to see some cracks in non-manufacturing, as measured by the global services PMI. If these PMIs can stabilize over coming months and specifically the services PMI remain above 50, as it has done in prior mid-cycle slowdowns, then our thesis on economic growth is intact. But risks are rising.
Exhibit 2: Manufacturing dips into contraction territory, while services stay near-trend
Watch the US consumer
The absolute key to whether the global economy can weather this geopolitical storm is the resiliency of the US consumer. As shown in Exhibit 3, the US consumer is about the same size in nominal GDP terms as is China's entire economy.
Exhibit 3: Nominal GDP of major economies
Consumption is a function of labor market incomes, which have decelerated but are in reasonable shape considering population growth and the length of the cycle. The risk scenario is that businesses, challenged by tariffs or other cost pressures, begin to cut back on labor. A rise in unemployment would sap consumer confidence, spending, and ultimately result in a recession.
So is our view that global growth will stabilize now invalid given the uncertain geopolitical environment? The answer for now, is no. We do not see enough evidence to suggest the US labor market or consumer is set to fold. While we look at a number of metrics, we find initial jobless claims a key leading indicator for the labor market and overall economy. Claims remain near historical lows and we would need to see a trend rise before turning more negative on the economy. Likewise, consumer confidence has tended to fall by more than 10% ahead of recessions. It remains near cycle highs—we are watching for deterioration here as well. Global growth stabilization remains the modal view, or base case, although the risks to that view have clearly risen.
Exhibit 4: Key signpost 1—initial jobless claims near historical lows
Exhibit 5: Key signpost 2—Consumer Confidence remaining steady
Central bank actions can cushion against, but not offset, geopolitical disruption
A key related question is whether the world's central banks, which are now easing almost universally, are doing enough to stave off recession. Certainly, the abrupt shift from developed economy central banks has eased financial conditions, providing a healthy cushion for consumers and businesses.
China's recent announcement of new stimulus measures, designed to increase liquidity and boost infrastructure investment, is also helpful. We think this global monetary easing will be enough to stave off a recession, but the crucial determinant will be if there are further meaningful negative shocks related to trade policy or another catalyst. Central banks do not have the tools to fully offset more pressure on the global trade environment, and its indirect effects on business and consumer confidence.
The bottom line: Asset allocation
Taking into account the rising risks to our base case on growth, we have a neutral outlook on global equities over the next 12 months and in some portfolios are tactically underweight. We are contrarian in our preference for European and Japanese equities relative to the US, as we believe that the former have much more bad news priced in. In fixed income we are also neutral, with a preference for US sovereign debt over that in Europe and Japan, as the Fed has more room to ease in a worsening growth environment. In line with this, we see the next big move in the dollar as lower, given it is overvalued and the US economy is 'catching down' to the rest of the world. We continue to be long the undervalued and safe-haven Yen and underweight the high beta Australian dollar as a hedge against further trade war escalation.
Asset class attractiveness
The chart below shows the views of our Asset Allocation team on overall asset class attractiveness, as well as the relative attractiveness within equities, fixed income and currencies, as of 30 August 2019.
Source: UBS Asset Management Investment Solutions Macro Asset Allocation Strategy team as at 30 August 2019. Views, provided on the basis of a 3-12 month investment horizon, are not necessarily reflective of actual portfolio positioning and are subject to change.
UBS Asset Management’s viewpoint
Ex-US Developed market Equities
Emerging Markets (EM) Equities
US Investment Grade (IG)
US High Yield Bonds
Emerging Markets Debt
Source: UBS Asset Management. As of 30 August 2019. Views, provided on the basis of a 3-12 month investment horizon, are not necessarily reflective of actual portfolio positioning and are subject to change.
Views and opinions expressed are presented for informational purposes only and are a reflection of UBS Asset Management’s best judgment at the time a report or other content was compiled. UBS specifically prohibits the redistribution or reproduction of this material in whole or in part without the prior written permission of UBS and UBS accepts no liability whatsoever for the actions of third parties in this respect. The information and opinions contained in the content of this webpage have been compiled or arrived at based upon information obtained from sources believed to be reliable and in good faith but no responsibility is accepted for any errors or omissions. All such information and opinions are subject to change without notice but any obligation to update or alter forward-looking statement as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise is disclaimed. Source for all data/charts, if not stated otherwise: UBS Asset Management.
Any market or investment views expressed are not intended to be investment research. Materials have not been prepared to address requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and are not subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination of investment research. The information contained in this webpage does not constitute a distribution, nor should it be considered a recommendation to purchase or sell any particular security or fund. The materials and content provided will not constitute investment advice and should not be relied upon as the basis for investment decisions. As individual situations may differ, clients should seek independent professional tax, legal, accounting or other specialist advisors as to the legal and tax implication of investing. Plan fiduciaries should determine whether an investment program is prudent in light of a plan's own circumstances and overall portfolio. A number of the comments in the content of this webpage are considered forward-looking statements. Actual future results, however, may vary materially. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Potential for profit is accompanied by possibility of loss.
© UBS 2020 The key symbol and UBS are among the registered and unregistered trademarks of UBS.