Financial disclosure principles
Based on discussions with analysts and investors, UBS
believes
that the market rewards companies that provide
clear, consistent and informative disclosure about their business.
Therefore, UBS aims to communicate its strategy and
results in a manner that allows shareholders and investors to
gain a full and accurate understanding of how the company
works, what its growth prospects are and what risks the
strategy and results might entail.
To continue to achieve these goals, UBS applies the
following principles in its financial reporting and disclosure:
transparency in disclosure is designed to enhance understanding
of the economic drivers and detailed results of
the business, building trust and credibility;
consistency in disclosure within each reporting period and
between reporting periods;
simplicity in disclosure allows readers to gain the appropriate
level of understanding of the firm’s businesses’ performance;
relevance in disclosure avoids information overload by
focusing
on what is relevant to UBS’s stakeholders, or
required
by regulation or statute; and
best practice in line with industry norms, leading the way
to improved standards where possible.
Financial reporting policies
UBS reports its results after the end of every quarter, including
a breakdown of results by business groups and business units
and extensive disclosures relating to credit and market risk.
UBS’s financial statements are prepared according to International
Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). A detailed
explanation of the basis of UBS’s accounting is given in Note
1 in Financial Statements 2007. An explanation of the critical
accounting policies applied in the preparation of UBS’s financial
statements is also provided in a specific section in Financial
Statements 2007.
UBS is committed to maintaining the transparency of its
reported results and to ensuring that analysts and investors
can make meaningful comparisons with previous periods. If
there is a major reorganization of its business units, or if
changes to accounting standards or interpretations lead to a
material change in the Group’s reported results, UBS’s results are restated for previous periods to show how they would
have been reported according to the new basis and provide
clear explanations of all changes.
US regulatory disclosure requirements
As a Swiss company listed on the New York Stock Exchange
(NYSE), UBS complies with the disclosure requirements of
the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the NYSE
for foreign private issuers. These include the requirement to
make certain filings with the SEC. As a foreign private issuer,
some of the SEC’s regulations and requirements which apply
to domestic issuers are not applicable to UBS. UBS’s regular
quarterly reports are provided to the SEC under cover of
Form 6-K, and UBS files an annual report on Form 20-F.
These reports, as well as materials sent to shareholders in
connection with annual and special shareholder meetings,
are all available at www.ubs.com/investors. As of the end of
the period covered by this annual report, an evaluation was
carried out under the supervision of management, including the Group Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Group Chief
Financial Officer (CFO), of the effectiveness of UBS’s disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a–15e)
under the US Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Based upon
that evaluation, the Group CEO and Group CFO concluded
that these disclosure controls and procedures were effective
as of the end of the period covered by this annual report. No
significant changes were made in UBS’s internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect these controls
subsequent to the date of their evaluation.
In accordance with Section 404 of the US Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, the management of UBS is responsible for establishing
and maintaining adequate internal control over
financial reporting. Financial Statements 2007, one of the
four reports that comprise UBS’s annual report, contains
management’s assessment (as of the time of publication of
the annual report) of the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting and the external auditors’ report on
such assessment.