Note 1 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

a) Significant Accounting Policies

1) Basis of accounting

UBS AG and subsidiaries ("UBS" or the "Group") provide a broad range of financial services including advisory services, underwriting, financing, market making, asset management and brokerage on a global level, and retail banking in ­Switzerland. The Group was formed on 29 June 1998 when Swiss Bank Corporation and Union Bank of Switzerland merged. The merger was accounted for using the uniting of interests method of accounting.

The consolidated financial statements of UBS (the "Financial Statements") are prepared in accordance with Inter­national Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB), and stated in Swiss francs (CHF), the currency of the country in which UBS AG is incorporated. On 8 March 2007, the Board of ­Directors approved them for issue.

2) Use of estimates in the preparation of Financial Statements

In preparing the Financial Statements, management is ­required to make estimates and assumptions that affect ­reported income, expenses, assets, liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Use of available information and application of judgment are inherent in the formation of estimates. Actual results in the future could differ from such estimates, and the differences may be material to the Financial Statements.

3) Subsidiaries and associates

The Financial Statements comprise those of the parent company (UBS AG) and its subsidiaries including certain special purpose entities, presented as a single economic entity. The effects of intra-group transactions are eliminated in preparing the Financial Statements. Subsidiaries including special purpose entities that are directly or indirectly controlled by the Group are consolidated. Subsidiaries acquired are consolidated from the date control is transferred to the Group. Subsidiaries to be divested are consolidated up to the date of disposal (i. e. loss of control).

Assets held in an agency or fiduciary capacity are not ­assets of the Group and are not reported in the Financial ­Statements.

Equity and net income attributable to minority interests are shown separately in the balance sheet and income statement.

Investments in associates in which UBS has a significant influence are accounted for under the equity method of accounting. Significant influence is normally evidenced when UBS owns 20% or more of a company's voting rights. Investments in associates are initially recorded at cost, and the ­carrying amount is increased or decreased to recognize the Group's share of the investee's net profit or loss (including net profit or loss recognized directly in equity) after the date of acquisition.

Assets and liabilities of subsidiaries and investments in ­associates are classified as "held for sale" if UBS has entered into an agreement for their disposal within a period of 12 months. Major lines of business and subsidiaries that were acquired exclusively with the intent for resale are presented as discontinued operations in the income statement in the period where the sale occurred or it becomes clear that a sale will occur within 12 months. Discontinued operations are presented in the income statement as a single amount comprising the total of profit or loss after tax from operations and net gain or loss on sale.

The Group sponsors the formation of entities, which may or may not be directly or indirectly owned subsidiaries, for the purpose of asset securitization transactions and structured debt issuance, and to accomplish certain narrow and well defined objectives. These companies may acquire assets directly or indirectly from UBS or its affiliates. Some of these companies are bankruptcy-remote entities whose ­assets are not available to satisfy the claims of creditors of the Group or any of its subsidiaries. Such companies are consolidated in the Group's Financial Statements when the substance of the relationship between the Group and the company indicates that the company is controlled by the Group. Certain transactions of consolidated entities meet the criteria for derecognition of financial assets – see part 4).

4) Recognition and derecognition of financial instruments

UBS recognizes financial instruments on its balance sheet when, and only when, the Group becomes a party to the contractual provisions of the instrument.

UBS enters into transactions where it transfers financial assets recognized on its balance sheet but retains either all risks and rewards of the transferred financial assets or a portion of them. If all or substantially all risks and rewards are retained, the transferred financial assets are not derecognized from the balance sheet. Transfers of financial assets with retention of all or substantially all risks and ­rewards include, for example, securities lending and repurchase transactions described under parts 12) and 13). They further include transactions where financial assets are sold to a third party with a concurrent total rate of return swap on the transferred assets to retain all their risks and rewards. These types of transactions are accounted for as secured financing transactions similar to repurchase ­agreements.

In transactions where substantially all of the risks and ­rewards of ownership of a financial asset are neither retained nor transferred, UBS derecognizes the financial asset if control over the asset is lost. The rights and obligations retained in the transfer are recognized separately as assets and liabilities as appropriate. In transfers where control over the financial asset is retained, the Group continues to recognize the asset to the extent of its continuing involvement, determined by the extent to which it is exposed to changes in the value of the transferred asset. Examples of such transactions are transfers of financial assets involving guarantees, writing put options, acquiring call options, or specific types of swaps linked to the performance of the asset.

UBS removes a financial liability from its balance sheet when, and only when, it is extinguished, i.e. when the obligation specified in the contract is discharged or cancelled or expires.

5) Determination of fair value

For financial instruments traded in active markets, the determination of fair values of financial assets and financial liabilities is based on quoted market prices or dealer price quotations. For all other financial instruments, fair value is determined using valuation techniques. Valuation techniques include net present value techniques, the discounted cash flow method, comparison to similar instruments for which market observable prices exist and valuation models. UBS uses widely recognized valuation models for determining fair values of common and more simple financial instruments like options or interest rate and currency swaps. For these financial instruments, inputs into models are market-observable.

For more complex instruments, UBS uses internally developed models, which are usually based on valuation methods and techniques generally recognized as standard within the industry. Some of the inputs to these models may not be market-observable and are therefore estimated based on assumptions. When entering into a transaction where model inputs are unobservable, the financial instrument is initially recognized at the transaction price, which is generally the best indicator of fair value. This may differ from the value obtained from the valuation model. The timing of the recognition in income of this initial difference in fair value depends on the individual facts and circumstances of each transaction but is never later than when the market data become observable. Refer to Note 30 Fair Value of Financial Instruments for further details.

The output of a model is always an estimate or approximation of a value that cannot be determined with certainty, and valuation techniques employed may not fully reflect all factors relevant to the positions UBS holds. Valuations are therefore adjusted, where appropriate, to allow for additional factors including model risks, liquidity risk and counterparty credit risk. Based on the established fair value and model governance policies and related controls and procedures applied, management believes that these valuation adjustments are necessary and appropriate to fairly state the values of financial instruments carried at fair value on the balance sheet.

6) Trading portfolio

Trading portfolio assets consist of money market paper, ­other debt instruments, including traded loans, equity instruments, precious metals and other commodities owned by the Group ("long" positions). Trading portfolio liabilities consist of obligations to deliver financial instruments such as money market paper, other debt instruments and equity ­instruments which the Group has sold to third parties but does not own ("short" positions).

The trading portfolio is carried at fair value. Gains and losses realized on disposal or redemption and un­realized gains and losses from changes in the fair value of trading portfolio assets and liabilities are reported as Net trading income. Interest and dividend income and expense on trading portfolio assets or liabilities are included in Interest and dividend income or Interest and dividend expense.

The Group uses settlement date accounting when recording trading financial asset transactions. From the date the transaction is entered into (trade date), UBS recognizes any unrealized profits and losses arising from revaluing that contract to fair value in Net trading income. The corresponding receivable or payable is presented on the balance sheet as a positive or negative replacement value. When the trans­action is consummated (settlement date), a resulting financial asset is recognized on or derecognized from the balance sheet at the fair value of the consideration given or received plus or minus the change in fair value of the contract since the trade date. When the Group becomes party to a sales contract of a financial asset classified in its trading portfolio, it derecognizes the asset on the day of its transfer (settlement date).

Trading portfolio assets transferred to external parties that do not qualify for derecognition (see part 4)) are reclassified on UBS‘s balance sheet from Trading portfolio assets to Trading portfolio assets pledged as collateral, if the transferee has received the right to sell or repledge them.

7) Financial assets and Financial liabilities designated at fair value through profit or loss ("Fair Value Option")

In June 2005, the IASB issued amendments to IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement in relation tothe fair value option ("Revised Fair Value Option"). UBS adoptedthe Revised Fair Value Option for financial instruments ona prospective basis on 1 January 2006.

Prior to 1 January 2006,UBS designated almost all of its issued hybrid debt instruments as Financial liabilities designated at fair value through profit or loss.These liabilities are presented in a separate line on the face of the balance sheet. A small amount of financial assets was also designated as Financial assets designated at fair value through profit or loss, and they are likewise presented in a separate line.A ­financial instrument may only be designated at fair value through profit or loss at inception and this designation ­cannot subsequently be changed.

Under the revised accounting standard, UBS continues to apply the fair value option for these existing financial instruments. The conditions for such designation are still met either on the basis that they are hybrid instruments which would otherwise have to be bifurcated into debt host contracts and embedded derivatives or because they are items that are part of a portfolio which is risk managed on a fair value basis and reported to senior management as such. In 2006, UBS started applying the fair value option to certain new loans and loan commitments which are substantially hedged with credit derivatives, to certain hybrid instruments resulting from structured repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements and to a hedge fund investment which is part of a portfolio managed on a fair value basis. All fair value changes related to financial instruments designated at fair value through profit or loss are recognized in Net trading income.

Interest and dividend income and interest expense on financial assets and liabilities designated at fair value through profit or loss are included in Interest income or Interest expense.

UBS applies the same recognition and derecognition ­principles to financial instruments designated at fair value as for financial instruments held for trading (refer to parts 4) and 6)).

8) Financial investments available-for-sale

Financial investments available-for-sale are non-derivative ­financial assets that are not classified as held for trading, designated at fair value through profit or loss, or loans and receivables. They are recognized on a settlement date basis. Financial investments available-for-sale are instruments that, in management's opinion, may be sold in response to or in anticipation of needs for liquidity or changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates or equity prices. Financial investments available-for-sale consist mainly of equity instruments, including certain private equity investments. In addition, certain debt instruments are classified as financial investments available-for-sale.

Financial investments available-for-sale are carried at fair value. Unrealized gains or losses are reported in Equity, net of applicable income taxes, until such investments are sold, collected or otherwise disposed of, or until any such investment is determined to be impaired. On disposal of an investment, the accumulated unrealized gain or loss included in Equity is transferred to Net profit and loss for the period and reported in Other income. Gains and losses on disposal are determined using the average cost method.

Interest and dividend income on financial investments available-for-sale are included in Interest and dividend income from financial investments available-for-sale.

If a financial investment available-for-sale is determined to be impaired, the cumulative unrealized loss previously ­recognized in Equity is included in Net profit and loss for the period and reported in Other income. UBS assesses at each balance sheet date whether there is objective evidence that a financial investment available-for-sale is impaired. In case of such evidence, it is considered impaired if its cost exceeds the recoverable amount. For a ­quoted financial investment available-for-sale, the recoverable amount is determined by reference to the market price. It is considered impaired if objective evidence indicates that the decline in market price has reached such a level that ­recovery of the cost value cannot be reasonably expected within the foreseeable future. For non-quoted financial instruments (debt and equity instruments), the recoverable amount is determined by applying recognized valuation techniques. The standard method applied for non-quoted equity investments available-for-sale is based on the multiple of earnings observed in the market for comparable companies. Management may adjust valuations determined in this way based on its judgment. For non-quoted debt instruments, UBS typically determines the recoverable amount by applying the discounted cash flow method.

After the recognition of impairment on a financial investment available-for-sale, a) increases in fair value of equity instruments are reported in Equity and b) increases in fair value of debt instruments up to original cost are recognized in Other income, provided the fair value increase has been triggered by a specific event (as defined by IFRS).

9) Loans

Loans include loans originated by the Group where money is provided directly to the borrower, participation in a loan from another lender and purchased loans that are not ­quoted in an active market and for which no intention of immediate or short-term resale exists. Originated and purchased loans that are intended to be sold in the short term are generally recorded as Trading portfolio assets.

Loans are recognized when cash is advanced to borrowers. They are initially recorded at fair value, which is the cash given to originate the loan, plus any transaction costs, and are subsequently measured at amortized cost using the effective interest rate method.

Interest on loans is included in Interest earned on loans and advances and is recognized on an accrual basis. Fees and direct costs relating to loan origination, refinancing or restructuring and to loan commitments are deferred and amortized to Interest earned on loans and advances over the life of the loan using the straight-line method which approximates the effective interest rate method. Fees received for commitments that are not expected to result in a loan are included in Credit-related fees and commissions over the commitment period. Loan syndication fees where UBS does not retain a portion of the syndicated loan are credited to commission income.

10) Allowance and provision for credit losses

An allowance or provision for credit losses is established if there is objective evidence that the Group will be unable to collect all amounts due on a claim according to the original contractual terms or the equivalent value. A ‘claim' means a loan carried at amortized cost, or a commitment such as a letter of credit, a guarantee, a commitment to extend credit or other credit products.

An allowance for credit losses is reported as a reduction of the carrying value of a claim on the balance sheet. For an off-balance sheet item, such as a commitment, a provision for credit loss is reported in Other liabilities. Additions to allowances and provisions for credit losses are made through Credit loss expense.

Allowances and provisions for credit losses are evaluated at a counterparty-specific level and collectively based on the following principles:

Counterparty-specific: A claim is considered impaired when management determines that it is probable that the Group will not be able to collect all amounts due according to the original contractual terms or the equivalent value.

Individual credit exposures are evaluated based on the borrower's character, overall financial condition, resources and payment record; the prospects for support from any ­financially responsible guarantors; and, where applicable, the realizable value of any collateral.

The estimated recoverable amount is the present value, using the loan's original effective interest rate, of expected future cash flows, including amounts that may result from restructuring or the liquidation of collateral. Impairment is measured and allowances for credit losses are established for the difference between the carrying amount and the estimated recoverable amount.

Upon impairment, the accrual of interest income based on the original terms of the claim is discontinued, but the increase of the present value of impaired claims due to the passage of time is reported as Interest income.

All impaired claims are reviewed and analyzed at least annually. Any subsequent changes to the amounts and timing of the expected future cash flows compared with the prior estimates result in a change in the allowance for credit losses and are charged or credited to Credit loss expense.

An allowance for impairment is reversed only when the credit quality has improved to such an extent that there is reasonable assurance of timely collection of principal and ­interest in accordance with the original contractual terms of the claim or equivalent value.

A write-off is made when all or part of a claim is deemed uncollectible or forgiven. Write-offs are charged against previously established allowances for credit losses or directly to Credit loss expense and reduce the principal amount of a claim. Recoveries in part or in full of amounts previously ­written off are credited to Credit loss expense.

A loan is classified as non-performing when the payment of interest, principal or fees is overdue by more than 90 days and there is no firm evidence that it will be made good by later payments or the liquidation of collateral, or when insolvency proceedings have commenced, or when obligations have been restructured on concessionary terms.

Collectively: All loans for which no impairment is identified on a counterparty-specific level are grouped into sub-portfolios with similar credit risk characteristics to collectively assess whether impairment exists within a portfolio. Allowances from collective assessment of impairment are recognized as Credit loss expense and result in an offset to the aggregated loan position. As the allowance cannot be allocated to individual loans, the loans are not considered to be impaired and interest is accrued on each loan according to its contractual terms.

11) Securitizations

UBS securitizes various consumer and commercial financial assets, which generally results in the sale of these assets to special purpose entities, which in turn issue securities to ­investors. Interests in the securitized financial assets may be retained in the form of senior or subordinated tranches, interest-only strips or other residual interests (‘retained interests'). Retained interests are primarily recorded in Trading portfolio assets and carried at fair value. Gains or losses on securitization are recorded in Net trading income.

12) Securities borrowing and lending

Securities borrowing and securities lending transactions are generally entered into on a collateralized basis. In such transactions, UBS typically lends or borrows securities in exchange for securities or cash collateral. Additionally, UBS borrows securities from its clients' custody accounts in exchange for a fee. The majority of securities lending and borrowing agree­ments involve shares, and the remainder typically involve bonds and notes. The transactions are conducted under standard agreements employed by financial market participants and are undertaken with counterparties subject to UBS's normal credit risk control processes. UBS monitors the market value of the securities received or delivered on a daily basis and requests or provides additional collateral or ­returns or recalls surplus collateral in accordance with the underlying agreements.

The securities which have been transferred, whether in a borrowing / lending transaction or as collateral, are not recognized on or derecognized from the balance sheet unless the risks and rewards of ownership are also transferred. In such transactions where UBS transfers owned securities and where the borrower is granted the right to sell or re-pledge them, the securities are reclassified on the balance sheet from Trading portfolio assets to Trading portfolio assets pledged as collateral. Cash collateral received is recognized with a corresponding obligation to return it (Cash collateral on securities lent). Cash collateral delivered is derecognized with a corresponding receivable reflecting UBS's right to ­receive it back (Cash collateral on securities borrowed). ­Securities received in a lending or borrowing transaction are disclosed as off-balance sheet items if UBS has the right to resell or re-pledge them, with securities that UBS has ­actually resold or repledged also disclosed separately (see Note 24). Additionally, the sale of securities received in a ­borrowing or lending transaction triggers the recognition of a trading liability (short sale).

Consideration exchanged (i. e. interest received or paid) is recognized on an accrual basis and recorded as Interest income or Interest expense.

13) Repurchase and reverse repurchase transactions

Securities purchased under agreements to resell (Reverse repurchase agreements) and securities sold under agreements to repurchase (Repurchase agreements) are generally treated as collateralized financing transactions. Nearly all repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements involve debt instruments, such as bonds, notes or money market paper. The transactions are conducted under standard agreements employed by financial market participants and are undertaken with counterparties subject to UBS's normal credit risk control processes. UBS monitors the market value of the securities received or delivered on a daily basis and ­requests or provides additional collateral or returns or recalls surplus collateral in accordance with the underlying agreements.

In reverse repurchase agreements, the cash delivered is derecognized and a corresponding receivable, including ­accrued interest, is recorded under the balance sheet line Reverse repurchase agreements, recognizing UBS's right to receive it back. In Repurchase agreements, the cash received, including accrued interest, is recognized on the balance sheet with a corresponding obligation to return it (Repurchase agreements). Securities received under reverse repurchase agreements and securities delivered under repurchase agreements are not recognized on or derecognized from the balance sheet, unless the risks and rewards of ownership are obtained or relinquished. In repurchase agreements where UBS transfers owned securities and where the recipient is granted the right to resell or re-pledge them, the securities are reclassified in the balance sheet from Trading portfolio assets to Trading portfolio assets pledged as collateral. Securities received in a reverse repurchase agreement are disclosed as off-balance sheet items if UBS has the right to resell or repledge them, with securities that UBS has actually resold or repledged also disclosed separately (see Note 24). Additionally, the sale of securities received in reverse repurchase transactions triggers the recognition of a trading liability (short sale).

Interest earned on reverse repurchase agreements and ­interest incurred on repurchase agreements is recognized as interest income or interest expense over the life of each agreement.

The Group offsets reverse repurchase agreements and ­repurchase agreements with the same counterparty for transactions covered by legally enforceable master netting agreements when net or simultaneous settlement is ­intended.

14) Derivative instruments and hedge accounting

All derivative instruments are carried at fair value on the balance sheet and are reported as Positive replacement values or Negative replacement values. Where the Group enters into derivatives for trading purposes, realized and unrealized gains and losses are recognized in Net trading income.

The Group also uses derivative instruments as part of its asset and liability management activities to manage exposures to interest rate, foreign currency and credit risks, ­including exposures arising from forecast transactions. The Group applies either fair value or cash flow hedge accounting when transactions meet the specified criteria to obtain hedge accounting treatment.

At the time a financial instrument is designated as a hedge, the Group formally documents the relationship ­between the hedging instrument(s) and hedged item(s), ­including the risk management objectives and strategy in undertaking the hedge transaction, together with the ­methods that will be used to assess the effectiveness of the hedging relationship. Accordingly, the Group assesses, both at the inception of the hedge and on an ongoing basis, whether the hedging derivatives have been "highly effective" in offsetting changes in the fair value or cash flows of the hedged items. UBS regards a hedge as highly effective only if the following criteria are met: a) at inception of the hedge and throughout its life, the hedge is expected to be highly effective in achieving offsetting changes in fair value or cash flows attributable to the hedged risk, and b) actual results of the hedge are within a range of 80% to 125%. In the case of hedging a forecast transaction, the transaction must have a high probability of occurring and must present an exposure to variations in cash flows that could ultimately affect the reported Net profit or loss. The Group discontinues hedge accounting when it determines that a derivative is not, or has ceased to be, highly effective as a hedge; when the derivative expires or is sold, terminated or exercised; when the hedged item matures, is sold or repaid; or when a forecast transaction is no longer deemed highly probable.

Hedge ineffectiveness represents the amount by which the changes in the fair value of the hedging derivative differ from changes in the fair value of the hedged item or the amount by which changes in the present value of cash flows of the hedging derivative differ from changes (or expected changes) in the present value of cash flows of the hedged item. Such ineffectiveness is recorded in current period earnings in Net trading income, as are gains and losses on components of a hedging derivative that are excluded from ­assessing hedge effectiveness.

For qualifying fair value hedges, the change in fair value of the hedging derivative is recognized in the income statement. Those changes in fair value of the hedged item that are attributable to the risks hedged with the derivative instrument are reflected in an adjustment to the carrying value of the hedged item, which is also recognized in the income statement. The fair value change of the hedged item in a portfolio hedge of interest rate risks is reported separately from the hedged portfolio in Other assets or Other liabilities as appropriate. If the hedge relationship is terminated for reasons other than the derecognition of the hedged item, the difference between the carrying value of the hedged item at that point and the value at which it would have been carried had the hedge never existed (the "unamortized fair value adjustment"), is, in the case of interest-bearing instruments, amortized to the income statement over the remaining term of the original hedge, while for non-interest bearing instruments that amount is immediately recognized in earnings. If the hedged item is derecognized, e.g. due to sale or repayment, the unamortized fair value adjustment is ­recognized immediately in the income statement.

A fair value gain or loss associated with the effective ­portion of a derivative designated as a cash flow hedge is recognized initially in Equity. When the cash flows that the derivative is hedging materialize, resulting in income or ­expense, then the associated gain or loss on the hedging derivative is simultaneously transferred from Equity to the corresponding income or expense line item.

If a cash flow hedge for a forecast transaction is deemed to be no longer effective, or if the hedge relationship is ­terminated, the cumulative gain or loss on the hedging ­derivative previously reported in Equity remains there until the committed or forecast transaction occurs or is no longer expected to occur, at which point it is transferred to the ­income statement.

Derivative instruments which are transacted as economic hedges but do not qualify for hedge accounting are treated in the same way as derivative instruments used for trading purposes, i.e. realized and unrealized gains and losses are recognized in Net trading income except that, in certain ­cases, the forward points on short duration foreign exchange contracts are presented in Net interest income. In particular, the Group has entered into economic hedges of credit risk within the loan portfolio using credit default swaps to which it cannot apply hedge accounting. In the event that the Group recognizes an impairment on a loan that is economically hedged in this way, the impairment is recognized in Credit loss expense, whereas any gain on the credit default swap is recorded in Net trading income. See Note 23 for additional information. Where UBS designates an economically hedged item at fair value through profit or loss, all fair value changes, including impairments, on both the hedged item and the hedging instrument are reflected in Net trading ­income (refer to part 7)).

A derivative may be embedded in a ‘host contract'. Such combinations are known as hybrid instruments and arise predominantly from the issuance of certain structured debt instruments. If the host contract is not carried at fair value with changes in fair value reported in the income statement, the embedded derivative is generally required to be separated from the host contract and accounted for as a stand-alone derivative instrument at fair value if the economic characteristics and risks of the embedded derivative are not closely ­related to the economic characteristics and risks of the host contract and the embedded derivative actually meets the definition of a derivative. Typically, UBS applies the fair value option to hybrid instruments (see part 7)), so that bifurcation of an embedded derivative component is not ­required.

15) Cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents consist of Cash and balances with central banks, balances included in Due from banks with original maturity of less than three months, and Money market paper included in Trading portfolio assets and Financial investments available-for-sale.

16) Physical commodities

Physical commodities (precious metals, base metals, energy and other commodities) held by UBS as a result of its broker-trader activities are accounted for at fair value less costs to sell and presented within the Trading portfolio. Changes in fair value less costs to sell are reflected in Net trading ­income.

17) Property and equipment

Property and equipment includes own-used properties, investment properties, leasehold improvements, IT, software and communication, plant and manufacturing equipment, and other machines and equipment.

Own-used property is defined as property held by the Group for use in the supply of services or for administrative purposes, whereas investment property is defined as property held to earn rental income and / or for capital appreciation. If a property of the Group includes a portion that is own-used and another portion that is held to earn rental income or for capital appreciation, the classification is based on whether or not these portions can be sold separately. If the portions of the property can be sold separately, they are separately accounted for as own-used property and investment property. If the portions cannot be sold separately, the whole property is classified as own-used property unless the portion used by the Group is minor. The classification of property is reviewed on a regular basis to account for major changes in its usage.

Leasehold improvements are investments made to customize buildings and offices occupied under operating lease contracts to make them suitable for the intended purpose. The present value of estimated reinstatement costs to bring a leased property into its original condition at the end of the lease, if required, is capitalized as part of the total leasehold improvements costs. At the same time, a corresponding liability is recognized to reflect the obligation incurred. Reinstatement costs are recognized in profit and loss through depreciation of the capitalized leasehold improvements over their estimated useful life.

Software development costs are capitalized when they meet certain criteria relating to identifiability, it is probable that future economic benefits will flow to the enterprise, and the cost can be measured reliably. Internally developed software meeting these criteria and purchased software are classified within IT, software and communication.

With the exception of investment properties, Property and equipment is carried at cost less accumulated depreciation and accumulated impairment losses, and is periodically reviewed for impairment. The useful life of property and equipment is estimated on the basis of the economic utilization of the asset.

Property and equipment is depreciated on a straight-line basis over its estimated useful life as follows:

Properties, excluding land Not exceeding 50 years

Leasehold improvements Residual lease term,

but not exceeding 10 years

Other machines and equipment Not exceeding 10 years

IT, software and communication Not exceeding 5 years

Property formerly own-used or leased to third parties ­under an operating lease and equipment the Group has decided to sell are classified as assets held for sale and recorded in Other assets. Upon classification as held for sale, they are no longer depreciated and are carried at the lower of book value or fair value less costs to sell. Foreclosed properties are included in Properties held for sale and recorded in Other ­assets. They are carried at the lower of cost and net realizable value.

Investment property is carried at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in the income statement in the ­period of change. UBS employs internal real estate experts to determine the fair value of investment property by applying recognized valuation techniques. In cases where prices of recent market transactions of comparable properties are available, fair value is determined by reference to these transactions.

18) Goodwill and other intangible assets

Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of an acquisition over the fair value of the Group's share of net identifiable assets of the acquired entity at the date of acquisition. Until 31 December 2004, goodwill acquired in business combinations entered into prior to 31 March 2004 was amortized over its estimated useful economic life, not exceeding 20 years, using the straight-line method. Since 31 December 2004, goodwill has not been amortized but is tested annually for impairment. The impairment test is conducted at the segment level as reported in Note 2a. The segment has been determined as the cash generating unit for impairment testing purposes as this is the level at which the performance of investments is reviewed and assessed by management.

Other intangible assets comprise separately identifiable intangible items arising from acquisitions and certain purchased trademarks and similar items. Other intangible assets acquired in business combinations are recognized on the balance sheet with their fair value at the date of acquisition and, if they have a definite useful life, are amortized using the straight-line method over their estimated useful economic life, generally not exceeding 20 years. At each balance sheet date, other intangible assets are reviewed for ­indications of impairment or changes in estimated future benefits. If such indications exist, the intangible assets are analyzed to assess whether their carrying amount is fully ­recoverable. A write-down is made if the carrying amount exceeds the recoverable amount.

Intangible assets are classified into two categories: a) infrastructure, and b) customer relationships, contractual rights and other. Infrastructure consists of an intangible ­asset recognized in connection with the acquisition of PaineWebber Group, Inc. Customer relationships, contractual rights and other includes mainly intangible assets for client relationships, non-compete agreements, favorable contracts, proprietary software, trademarks and trade names acquired in business combinations.

19) Income taxes

Income tax payable on profits is recognized as an expense based on the applicable tax laws in each jurisdiction in the period in which profits arise. The tax effects of income tax losses available for carry forward are recognized as a deferred tax asset if it is probable that future taxable profit will be available against which those losses can be utilized.

Deferred tax liabilities are recognized for temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities in the balance sheet and their amounts as measured for tax purposes, which will result in taxable amounts in future periods. Deferred tax assets are recognized for temporary differences that will result in deductible amounts in future periods, but only to the extent it is probable that sufficient taxable profits will be available against which these differences can be utilized.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured at the tax rates that are expected to apply in the period in which the asset will be realized or the liability will be settled based on enacted rates.

Tax assets and liabilities of the same type (current or deferred) are offset when they arise from the same tax reporting group, they relate to the same tax authority, the legal right to offset exists, and they are intended to be settled net or realized simultaneously.

Current and deferred taxes are recognized as Income tax benefit or expense except for (i) deferred taxes recognized or disposed of upon the acquisition or disposal of a subsidiary, (ii) unrealized gains or losses on financial investments available-for-sale and changes in fair value of derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges, and (iii) certain tax benefits on deferred compensation awards. Items (ii) and (iii) are recorded in Net income recognized directly in equity.

20) Debt issued

Debt issued is initially measured at fair value, which is the consideration received, net of transaction costs incurred. Subsequent measurement is at amortized cost, using the effective interest rate method to amortize cost at inception to the redemption value over the life of the debt.

Hybrid debt instruments that are related to non-UBS AG equity instruments, foreign exchange, credit instruments or indices are considered structured instruments. If such instruments have not been designated at fair value through profit or loss, the embedded derivative is separated from the host contract and accounted for as a stand-alone derivative if the criteria for separation are met. The host contract is subsequently measured at amortized cost. UBS has designated most of its structured debt instruments at fair value through profit or loss – see part 7).

The fair value option is not applied to certain hybrid instruments which contain bifurcatable embedded derivatives with references to foreign exchange rates and precious metal prices and which are not hedged by derivative instruments. Those hybrids are still subject to bifurcation of the embedded derivative.

Debt instruments with embedded derivatives that are ­related to UBS AG shares or to a derivative instrument that has UBS AG shares as its underlying are separated into a ­liability and an equity component at issue date if they ­require physical settlement. When the hybrid debt instrument is issued, a portion of the net proceeds is allocated to the debt component based on its fair value. The determination of fair value is generally based on quoted market prices for UBS debt instruments with comparable terms. The debt component is subsequently measured at amortized cost. The remaining amount of the net proceeds is allocated to the equity component and reported in Share premium. Subsequent changes in fair value of the separated equity component are not recognized. However, if the hybrid instrument or the embedded derivative related to UBS AG shares is to be cash settled or if it contains a settlement alternative, then the separated derivative is accounted for as a trading instrument, with changes in fair value recorded in Net ­trading income unless the entire hybrid debt instrument is designated at fair value through profit or loss with changes in fair value of the entire hybrid instrument also reflected in Net trading income (see part 7)).

It is the Group's policy to hedge the fixed interest rate risk on debt issues (except for certain subordinated long-term note issues, see Note 23), and to apply fair value hedge ­accounting, if the fair value option is not applied to such financial instruments – see part 7). When hedge accounting is applied to fixed-rate debt instruments, the carrying values of debt issues are adjusted for changes in fair value related to the hedged exposure rather than carried at amortized cost – refer to part 14). Derivative instruments and hedge accounting for further discussion.

Bonds issued by UBS held as a result of market making activities or deliberate purchases in the market are treated as a redemption of debt. A gain or loss on redemption is recorded depending on whether the repurchase price of the bond is lower or higher than its carrying value. A subsequent sale of own bonds in the market is treated as a reissuance of debt.

Interest expense on debt instruments is included in Interest on debt issued.

21) Retirement benefits

UBS sponsors a number of retirement benefit plans for its employees worldwide. These plans include both defined benefit and defined contribution plans and various other retirement benefits such as post-employment medical ­benefits. Contributions to defined contribution plans are ­expensed when employees have rendered services in exchange for such contributions, generally in the year of contribution.

The Group uses the projected unit credit actuarial method to determine the present value of its defined benefit plans and the related service cost and, where applicable, past ­service cost.

The principal actuarial assumptions used by the actuary are set out in Note 31.

The Group recognizes a portion of its actuarial gains and losses as income or expense if the net cumulative unrecognized actuarial gains and losses at the end of the previous reporting period are outside the corridor defined as the greater of:

a) 10% of present value of the defined benefit obligation at that date

a) (before deducting plan assets); and

b) 10% of the fair value of any plan assets at that date.

The unrecognized actuarial gains and losses exceeding the greater of these two values are recognized in the income statement over the expected average remaining working lives of the employees participating in the plans.

If an excess of the fair value of the plan assets over the present value of the defined benefit obligation cannot be recovered fully through refunds or reductions in future contributions, no gain is recognized solely as a result of deferral of an actuarial loss or past service cost in the current period, and no loss is recognized solely as a result of deferral of an actuarial gain in the current period.

22) Equity participation plans

UBS provides various equity participation plans in the form of share plans and share option plans. UBS recognizes the fair value of share and share option awards determined at the date of grant as compensation expense over the required service period, which generally is equal to the vesting period. The fair value of share awards is equal to the market price at the date of grant. For share options, fair value is determined using a Monte Carlo valuation model which takes into account the specific terms and conditions under which the share options are granted. Equity settled awards are classified as equity instruments and are not re-measured subsequent to the grant date, unless an award is modified such that its fair value immediately after modification exceeds its fair value immediately prior to modification. Any increase in fair value resulting from a modification is recognized as compensation expense, either over the remaining service period or immediately for vested awards.

Cash settled awards are classified as liabilities and re-measured to fair value at each balance sheet date as long as they are outstanding. Decreases in fair value reduce compensation expense, and no compensation expense, on a cumulative basis, is recognized for awards that expire worthless or remain unexercised. Up to and including 2004, certain plans gave participants the ability to roll their share-based awards into alternative investments. These plans are treated as cash-settled. UBS no longer provides this roll-over option to its employees.

23) Equity, treasury shares and contracts on UBS shares

UBS AG shares held by the Group are classified in Equity as Treasury shares and accounted for at weighted average cost. The difference between the proceeds from sales of Treasury shares and their cost (net of tax, if any) is classified as Share premium.

Contracts that require physical settlement in UBS AG shares are classified as Equity and reported as Share premium. Upon settlement of such contracts, the proceeds received – less cost (net of tax, if any) – are reported as Share premium.

Contracts on UBS AG shares that require net cash settlement or provide the counterparty with a choice of settlement are classified as trading instruments, with changes in fair value reported in the income statement.

An exception to this treatment is physically settled written put options and forward share purchase contracts, including contracts where physical settlement is a settlement alter­native. In both cases, the present value of the obligation to purchase own shares in exchange for cash is transferred out of Equity and recognized as a liability at inception of a contract. The liability is subsequently accreted, using the effective interest rate method, over the life of the contract to the nominal purchase obligation by recognizing interest expense. Upon settlement of a contract, the liability is derecognized, and the amount of equity originally transferred to liability is reclassified within Equity to Treasury shares. The premium received for writing put options is recognized directly in Share premium.

UBS has issued trust preferred securities through consolidated preferred funding trusts, which hold debt issued by UBS. UBS AG has fully and unconditionally guaranteed all of these securities. UBS's obligations under these guarantees are subordinated to the prior payment in full of the deposit liabilities of UBS and all other liabilities of UBS. The trust preferred securities represent equity instruments which are owned by third parties. They are presented as minority interests in UBS's consolidated financial statements with dividends paid also reported under Equity attributable to minority interests. UBS bonds held by preferred funding trusts are eliminated in consolidation.

24) Discontinued operations and non-current assets held for sale

UBS classifies non-current non-financial assets (or disposal groups) as held for sale, e.g. properties, if their carrying amount will be recovered principally through a sale transaction rather than through continuing use – see part 17). Such assets (or disposal groups) are available for immediate sale in their present condition subject to terms that are usual and customary for sales of such assets (or disposal groups) and their sale is considered highly probable. These assets are measured at the lower of their carrying amount and fair value less costs to sell.

UBS presents discontinued operations under a separate line in the income statement if an entity or a component of an entity has been disposed of or is classified as held for sale and a) represents a separate major line of business or geographical area of operations, or b) is a subsidiary acquired exclusively with a view to resale (e.g. certain private equity investments). A component of an entity comprises operations and cash flows that can be clearly distinguished, operationally and for financial reporting purposes, from the rest of UBS's operations and cash flows. If an entity or a component of an entity is classified as a discontinued operation, UBS restates prior periods in the income statement – see part 3).

25) Leasing

UBS enters into lease contracts, predominately of premises and equipment, as a lessor as well as a lessee. The terms and conditions of these contracts are assessed and the leases are classified as operating leases or finance leases according to their economic substance. When making such an assessment, the Group focuses on the following aspects: a) Is ownership of the asset transferred to the lessee by the end of the lease term?; b) Is a bargain purchase option held by the lessee?; c) Is the lease term for the major part of the economic life of the asset?; d) Does the present ­value of the minimum lease payments amount to at least substantially all of the fair ­value of the leased asset at inception of the lease term? The existence of such conditions, individually or in combination with others, normally leads to a lease being classified as a finance lease, while the non-existence normally leads to a lease being classified as an operating lease.

Lease contracts classified as operating leases where UBS is the lessee are disclosed in Note 27 Operating Lease Commitments. These contracts include non-cancellable long-term leases of office buildings in most UBS locations. Lease contracts classified as operating leases where UBS is the lessor, and finance lease contracts where UBS is the lessor or the lessee, are not material.

26) Fee income

UBS earns fee income from a diverse range of services it provides to its customers. Fee income can be divided into two broad categories: income earned from services that are provided over a certain period of time, for which customers are generally billed on an annual or semi-annual basis, and income earned from providing transaction-type services. Fees earned from services that are provided over a certain period of time are recognized ratably over the service period. Fees earned from providing transaction-type services are recognized when the service has been completed. Performance-linked fees or fee components are recognized when the ­recognition criteria are fulfilled.

The following fee income is predominantly earned from services that are provided over a period of time: investment fund fees, fiduciary fees, custodian fees, portfolio and other management and advisory fees, insurance-related fees, credit-related fees and commission income. Fees predominantly earned from providing transaction-type services include underwriting fees, corporate finance fees and brokerage fees.

27) Foreign currency translation

Foreign currency transactions are recorded at the rate of ­exchange on the date of the transaction. At the balance sheet date, monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are reported using the closing exchange rate. Exchange differences arising on the settlement of transactions at rates different from those at the date of the transaction, as well as unrealized foreign exchange differences on unsettled foreign currency monetary assets and liabilities, are recognized in the income statement.

Unrealized exchange differences on non-monetary financial assets (investments in equity instruments) are a com­ponent of the change in their entire fair value. For a non-monetary financial asset held for trading and for non- monetary financial assets designated at fair value through profit or loss, unrealized exchange differences are recognized in the income statement. For non-monetary financial investments available-for-sale, unrealized exchange differences are recorded directly in Equity until the asset is sold or becomes impaired.

When preparing consolidated financial statements, assets and liabilities of foreign entities are translated at the exchange rates at the balance sheet date, while income and expense items are translated at weighted average rates for the period. Differences resulting from the use of closing and weighted average exchange rates and from revaluing a foreign entity's net asset balance at the closing rate are recognized directly in Foreign currency translation within Equity.

28) Earnings per share (EPS)

Basic earnings per share are calculated by dividing the Net profit and loss for the period attributable to ordinary shareholders by the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the period.

Diluted earnings per share are calculated using the same method as for basic EPS, but the determinants are adjusted to reflect the potential dilution that could occur if options, warrants, convertible debt securities or other contracts to ­issue ordinary shares were converted or exercised into ordinary shares.

29) Segment reporting

UBS's financial businesses are organized on a worldwide ­basis into three Business Groups and the Corporate Center. Global Wealth Management & Business Banking consists of three segments: Wealth Management International & Switzerland, Wealth Management US and Business Banking Switzerland. The Business Groups Investment Bank and Global Asset Management constitute one segment each. The Corporate Center represents one segment in 2006, as Private Banks & GAM was sold on 2 December 2005. Additionally, the Industrial Holdings segment holds all industrial operations controlled by the Group. In total, UBS reports seven business segments.

Segment income, segment expenses and segment per­formance include transfers between business segments and between geographical segments. Such transfers are conducted either at internally agreed transfer prices or, where possible, at arm's length.

30) Revenues from Industrial Holdings and Goods and materials purchased

Revenues from Industrial Holdings include sales of goods and services from three consolidated entities and are derived from various businesses. Revenue is generally recognized upon customer acceptance of goods delivered and when services have been rendered. Expenses from Goods and ­materials purchased include costs for raw materials, parts and finished goods purchased from third-party suppliers to produce the goods and services sold.

b) Changes in accounting policies, comparability and other adjustments

Effective in 2006

In June 2005, the IASB issued amendments to IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement in regard to the fair value option. UBS adopted the revised IAS 39 fair value option on 1 January 2006. Under the amended guidance, the use of the fair value option requires that at least one of three defined criteria is satisfied, which is more restrictive than the previous guidance. All financial instruments ­designated at fair value through profit or loss at 31 Decem- ber 2005 continued to qualify for the use of the fair value option under the revised fair value option. On transition date of the revised standard, 1 January 2006, UBS did not apply the fair value option to any previously recognized financial asset or financial liability, for which the fair value option had not been used under the previous fair value option guidance. Therefore, the initial adoption of the revised standard did not have an impact on UBS's financial statements. See part 7) for details on the use of the revised fair value option during the year 2006. In addition, effective 1 January 2006, the disclosure requirements for financial instruments designated at fair value through profit or loss have been amended due to the revision of IAS 32 Financial Instruments: Presentation.

Prime Brokerage

UBS has reclassified certain receivables and payables resulting from its Prime Brokerage business for the years ended 2002 through 2006 to ensure consistent presentation of identical items throughout UBS. See the next page for reclassifications that have been made to previously disclosed amounts.

The adjustments had no effect on Net profit, Basic earnings per share and Diluted earnings per share in all years presented. UBS's internal measures of credit exposure and regulatory capital are unaffected by the reclassification.

Cash collateral on securities borrowed

Counterparty information on receivables resulting from cash paid as collateral in securities borrowing transactions is ­disclosed in Note 11. For comparability reasons, UBS reclassified CHF 183 billion from receivables against banks to receivables against customers on 31 December 2005.

Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) 108

In response to the release of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) 108, Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial ­Statements, UBS elected to adopt a modified quantitative framework for assessing whether the financial statement effect of a misstatement is material because it renders a better evaluation of those effects. The new method, which UBS adopted in December 2006, uses a dual approach for quantifying the effect of a misstatement. Prior to 2006, UBS applied only one of those methods, the "roll-over" method, which focused on the current-year income-statement impact of a misstatement. Under the new policy, UBS applies a dual approach that considers both the carryover and reversing effects of prior year misstatements. As a ­result of the new policy, the opening balance of ­Accrued expenses and deferred income at 1 January 2002 was increased by CHF 399 million, Retained earnings were reduced by CHF 309 million and Deferred taxes of CHF 90 million were recognized on balance sheet. The adjustments ­relate to the under-accrual of unused vacation, sabbatical leave and service anniversary awards. The restatement impact of adopting this new policy is immaterial to all quarterly and annual income statements, earnings per share amounts, and balance sheets since 1 January 2002.

Amendments to existing standards and new interpretations

Minor amendments have been made to the following existing International Accounting Standards, which were effective and have been adopted by UBS at 1 January 2006.

IAS 19 Employee Benefits has been amended to allow a choice of whether to recognize actuarial gains and losses in a defined post-retirement benefit plan immediately in equity or to apply the corridor approach. UBS decided to continue to apply the corridor approach as described in part a 21). Other amendments made to IAS 19 have no impact on UBS.

IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Measurement and Recognition and IFRS 4 Insurance Contracts have been amended in relation to financial guarantee contracts to clarify when a financial guarantee is within the scope of IAS 39 and when it is considered an insurance contract within the scope of IFRS 4. This amendment did not have a material impact on UBS's Financial Statements.

IAS 21 The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates has been amended to require that exchange differences arising in consolidation on loan financings that form part of a net investment in a foreign operation and are denominated in a currency other than the functional currencies of both the reporting entity and the foreign operation, are reclassified to equity in the consolidated financial statements of the reporting entity. This amendment has no significant impact on UBS's Financial Statements.

IFRIC 4 Leases: Determining Whether an Arrangement Contains a Lease

IFRIC 4 was issued in December 2004 and provides guidance on a) how to determine whether an arrangement is, or contains, a lease as defined in IAS 17; b) when the assessment or a reassessment of whether an arrangement is, or contains, a lease should be made; and c) if an arrangement is, or contains, a lease, how the payments for the lease should be separated from payments for any other elements in the arrangement. If an arrangement contains a lease element, the interpretation requires that the payments for the lease element are accounted for in accordance with IAS 17 Leases. UBS adopted the interpretation on 1 January 2006, its effective date. The interpretation had no material effect on UBS's Financial Statements.

Effective in 2005 and earlier

Private equity investments

On 1 January 2005, UBS adopted revised IAS 27 Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements and revised IAS 28 Investments in Associates.

IAS 27 was amended to eliminate the exemption from consolidating a subsidiary where control is exercised temporarily. UBS has several private equity investments where it owns a controlling interest that used to be classified and ­accounted for as Financial investments available-for-sale. UBS adopted IAS 27 on 1 January 2005 retrospectively and restated comparative prior years 2004 and 2003. The effect of the adoption and consolidating these investments was as follows: at 1 January 2003, equity including minority interests was reduced by CHF 723 million, representing the difference between the carrying value as Financial investments available-for-sale and the book value on a consolidated basis. Consolidation led to recognition of total assets in the amount of CHF 1.7 billion and CHF 2.9 billion at 31 December 2004 and 2003 respectively. Significant balance sheet line items affected include Property and equipment, Intangible assets, Goodwill and Other assets. These investments generated additional operating income of CHF 2.5 billion and additional Net profit attributable to UBS shareholders of CHF 142 million in 2004.

IAS 28 was likewise amended to eliminate the exemption from equity method accounting for investments that are held exclusively for disposal. Private equity investments where UBS has significant influence are now accounted for using the equity method whereas they were previously ­classified as Financial investments available-for-sale. The adoption was made retrospectively from 1 January 2003 and prior periods were restated. Application of the equity method of accounting for these investments had the following effects: on 1 January 2003, opening equity was debited by CHF 266 million, representing the difference between the carrying value as Financial investments available-for-sale and the book value on an equity method basis. The carrying ­value of these equity method investments was CHF 248 million and CHF 393 million at 31 December 2004 and 2003 respectively, which includes equity in losses of CHF 55 million recognized in the income statement in 2004. Gains on sale recognized in 2004 were CHF 1 million. When accounted for as Financial investments available-for-sale, gains on sale ­recognized were CHF 70 million in 2004.

These entities, along with all other investments made by the private equity business unit, were reclassified from the Investment Bank segment to the Industrial Holdings segment effective 1 January 2005. In addition, nine of the newly consolidated investments held at 1 January 2003 were sold after that date (but before 1 January 2006) and are presented as Discontinued operations in the restated comparative prior periods in accordance with IFRS 5, which is discussed on the next page. Gains on sale of CHF 90 million were reported in 2004 in connection with private equity investments sold. On a restated basis, the Net profit from discontinued operations related to these entities was CHF145 million in 2004.

IFRS 2 Share-based Payment

In February 2004, the IASB issued IFRS 2 Share-based Payment, which requires share-based payments made to employees and non-employees to be recognized in the financial statements based on the fair value of these awards measured at the date of grant. UBS adopted the new standard on 1 January 2005 and fully restated the two comparative prior years. In accordance with IFRS 2, UBS applied the new requirements of the standard to all prior period awards that affect income statements commencing 1 January 2003. This includes all unvested equity-settled awards and all outstanding cash-settled awards on 1 January 2003. The effects of restatement were as follows: the opening balance of ­retained earnings at 1 January 2003 was credited by CHF 559 million. Additional compensation expense of zero was recognized in 2004. The change in compensation expense is attributable to the first-time recognition of compensation expense for the fair value of share options, as well as the recognition of expense for share awards over the vesting ­period. Previously, share awards were recognized as compensation expense in the performance year, which is generally the year prior to grant. The reason for the zero impact in 2004 was that a significantly higher amount of bonus payments were made in the form of share awards rather than cash. The reversal of compensation expense attributable to these share payments offsets the effect from recognizing ­options at fair value and share awards made prior to 2004 over the vesting period.

UBS introduced a new valuation model to determine the fair value of share options granted in 2005 and later. Share options granted in 2004 and earlier were not affected by this change in valuation model. As part of the implementation of IFRS 2, UBS thoroughly reviewed the option valuation model employed in the past by comparing it with alternative models. As a result of this review, a valuation model was identified that better reflects the exercise behavior of employees and the specific terms and conditions under which the share options are granted. Concurrent with the introduction of the new model, UBS is using implied and historical volatility as inputs.

UBS also has employee benefit trusts that are used in ­connection with share-based payment arrangements and deferred compensation schemes. In connection with the issuance of IFRS 2, the IFRIC amended SIC 12 Consolidation –Special Purpose Entities, an interpretation of IAS 27, to eliminate the scope exclusion for equity compensation plans. Therefore, pursuant to the criteria set out in SIC 12, an entity that controls an employee benefit trust (or similar entity) set up for the purpose of a share-based payment arrangement is required to consolidate that trust. Consolidating these trusts had the following effects: on 1 January 2003, no adjustment to opening retained earnings was made as assets and liabilities of the trusts were equal. Consolidation led to recognition of total assets in the amount of CHF 1.1 billion and CHF1.3 billion and liabilities of CHF 1.1 billion and CHF 1.3 billion at 31 December 2004 and 2003 respectively. The amount of treasury shares increased by CHF 2,029 million and CHF 1,474 million at 31 December 2004 and 2003 ­respectively. The weighted average number of treasury shares held by these trusts was 45,991,908 in 2004, thus decreasing the denominator used to calculate basic earnings per share. The reduction in weighted average shares outstanding increased basic earnings per share, but had no impact on diluted earnings per share as the additional treasury shares will be fully added back for calculating diluted earnings per share.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

On 31 March 2004, the IASB issued IFRS 3 Business Combinations, revised IAS 36 Impairment of Assets and revised IAS 38 Intangible Assets. UBS prospectively adopted the standards for goodwill and intangible assets existing at 31 March 2004 on 1 January 2005,whereas goodwill and intangible assets recognized from business combinations entered into after 31 March 2004 were accounted for immediately in accordance with IFRS 3. Goodwill is no longer amortized, but instead reviewed annually for impairment. UBS recorded goodwill amortization expense of CHF 722 million in 2004.

Intangible assets acquired in a business combination must be recognized separately from goodwill if they meet defined recognition criteria. Existing intangible assets that do not meet the recognition criteria under the new standards have to be reclassified to goodwill. On 1 January 2005, UBS reclassified the trained workforce intangible asset recognized in connection with the acquisition of PaineWebber with a book value of CHF 1.0 billion to goodwill.

Insurance Contracts

On 31 March 2004, the IASB issued IFRS 4 Insurance Contracts. The standard applies to all insurance contracts written and to reinsurance contracts held. The majority of insurance products issued by UBS is considered to be investment contracts and is accounted for as financial liabilities and not as insurance contracts under IFRS 4. The related assets of CHF 19 billion were reclassified from Other assets to Trading portfolio assets in 2004. UBS adopted the new standard as of 1 January 2005 and applies it to its insurance contracts. The new standard did not have a material effect on the Financial Statements.

Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations

On 31 March 2004, the IASB issued IFRS 5 Non-current ­Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations. The standard requires that non-current assets or disposal groups be classified as held for sale if their carrying amount is recovered principally through a sale transaction rather than through continuing use. Such assets are measured at the lower of carrying amount and fair value less costs to sell and are classified separately from other assets in the balance sheet. Netting of assets and liabilities is not permitted. Discontinued operations are presented on the face of the income statement as a single amount comprising the total of the Net profit and loss from discontinued operations and the gain or loss after tax recognized on the sale or the measurement to fair value less costs to sell of the net assets constituting the discontinued operations. In the period where an operation is presented for the first time as discontinued, the income statements for all comparative prior periods presented are restated to present that operation as discontinued.

IFRS 5 provides certain criteria to be met for a component of an entity to be defined as a discontinued operation. ­Private Banks & GAM, Motor-Columbus and certain private equity investments meet this definition and were reclassified to Discontinued operations. UBS adopted the new standard on 1 January 2005 and restated the comparative prior year 2004. The income statement is now divided into two sections: Net profit from continuing operations and Net profit from discontinued operations. Refer to Note 38 Discontinued Operations for details.

Presentation of minority interests and earnings per share

With the adoption of revised IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements on 1 January 2005, Net profit and Equity are presented including minority interests. Net profit is split into Net profit attributable to UBS shareholders and Net profit attributable to minority interests. Earnings per share continue to be calculated based on Net profit attributable to UBS shareholders, but they are split into Earnings per share from continuing operations and from discontinued operations. Minority interests and Earnings per share are presented on the face of the income statement.

Financial Instruments

On 1 January 2004, UBS adopted revised IAS 32 Financial Instruments: Disclosure and Presentation and revised IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement, which were applied retrospectively to all financial instruments affected by the two standards, except the guidance relating to derecognition of financial assets and liabilities and, in part, recognition of Day 1 profit and loss, which were applied ­prospectively. As a result of adopting the revised standards, UBS restated prior period comparative information.

Revised IAS 32 amended the accounting for certain derivative contracts linked to an entity's own shares. Physically settled written put options and forward purchase contracts with UBS shares as their underlying are recorded as liabili- ties – see part a 23). UBS currently has physically settled ­written put options linked to own shares. The present value of the contractual amount of these options is recorded as a liability, while the premium received is credited to Equity. ­Liabilities of CHF 96 million at 31 December 2004 and CHF 49 million at 31 December 2003 were debited to Equity attributable to UBS shareholders due to written put options. The impact on the income statement of all periods presented is insignificant. All other existing derivative contracts linked to own shares are accounted for as derivative instruments and are carried at fair value on the balance sheet under Positive replacement values or Negative replacement values.

Revised IAS 39 permits any financial instrument to be designated at inception, or at adoption of revised IAS 39, as carried at fair value through profit or loss. Upon adoption of revised IAS 39, UBS made that designation for the majority of its compound instruments issued. Previously, UBS ­separated the embedded derivative from the host contract and accounted for the separated derivative as a trading ­instrument. The amounts are now included on the balance sheet within the line item Financial liabilities designated at fair value, with amounts of CHF 117,401 million and CHF 65,756 million at 31 December 2005 and 2004 being reported in that line. Also, at 31 December 2005 and 2004 assets in the amount of CHF 1,153 million and CHF 653 million are reported in the line Financial assets designated at fair value.

The guidance governing recognition and derecognition of a financial asset is considerably more complex under revised IAS 39 than previously and requires a multi-step decision process to determine whether derecognition is appropriate. See part a 4) for a discussion of the accounting policies regarding derecognition. As a result, certain transactions are now accounted for as secured financing transactions instead of purchases or sales of trading portfolio assets with an accompanying swap derivative. The provisions of this guidance were applied prospectively from 1 January 2004.

Credit losses incurred on OTC derivatives

Effective 1 January 2004, the method of accounting for credit losses incurred on over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives was changed. All such credit losses are now reported in Net trading income and are no longer reported in Credit loss ­expense. This change did not affect Net profit or Earnings per share. It did, however, affect segment reporting, since losses reported as Credit loss expense were previously deferred over a three-year period in the Business Group segment reporting, whereas, under the changed method of ­accounting, losses in trading income are not subject to such a deferral. In the segment report, therefore, losses on OTC derivatives are now reported as they are incurred.

Segment reporting

On 1 July 2005, UBS integrated its two wealth management businesses into one Business Group, Global Wealth Management & Business Banking. As part of the integration, the municipal securities unit within the former Wealth Management US was transferred into the Investment Bank. The integration had no effect on the presentation of segments in Note 2a, and Wealth Management US continues to be reported as a separate segment. The comparative prior period information for the Wealth Management US and Investment Bank segments has been restated to reflect the transfer of the municipal securities unit. In 2005 and 2004, the municipal securities unit contributed between 7% and 9% to Wealth Management US revenues and a substantial portion to performance before tax.

On 1 July 2004, UBS purchased an additional 20% interest in Motor-Columbus AG, increasing its overall ownership stake to 55.6%. Motor-Columbus was consolidated on 1 July 2004, when UBS gained control over the company. Due to its size and the nature of its business (production, distribution and trading of electricity) a new business segment, Industrial Holdings, was added in which Motor-Columbus was reported. Motor-Columbus is presented as a discontinued operation in these Financial Statements due to the sale on 23 March 2006. Also included in the Industrial Holdings segment are all private equity investments, which comprise businesses of a predominantly industrial nature.

c) International Financial Reporting Standards and Interpretations to be adopted in 2007 and later

IFRS 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosures

Effective 1 January 2007, UBS will adopt the disclosure requirements for financial instruments under IFRS 7. The new standard has no impact on recognition, measurement and presentation of financial instruments. Accordingly, it will have no effect on Net profit and Equity. Rather, it requires entities to provide disclosures in their financial statements that enable users to evaluate: a) the significance of financial instruments for the entity's financial position and performance; and b) the nature and extent of the credit, market and liquidity risks arising from financial instruments during the period and at the reporting date, and how the entity manages those risks. The principles of IFRS 7 complement the principles for recognizing, measuring and presenting ­financial assets and financial liabilities in IAS 32 Financial ­Instruments:Presentation and IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement.

UBS has entered into transactions for which fair value is determined using valuation models for which not all inputs are market-observable prices or rates. Such financial instruments are initially recognized in UBS's Financial Statements at the transaction price, which is generally the best indicator of fair value, although the value obtained from the relevant valuation model may differ. Where such differences arise, UBS will be required by IFRS 7 to disclose, by class of financial instrument: (a) its accounting policy for recognizing that difference in profit or loss to reflect a change in factors ­(including time) that market participants would consider in setting a price, and (b) the aggregate difference yet to be recognized in profit or loss at the beginning and end of the period and a reconciliation of changes in the balance of this difference.

IFRS 8 Operating Segments

The new standard on segment reporting, IFRS 8 Operating Segments, comes into force on 1 January 2009, replacing IAS 14 Segment Reporting. It sets out requirements for disclosure of information about a firm's operating segments, its products and services, the geographical areas in which it ­operates, and its major customers. The new standard introduces changes to previous requirements for identification of segments, measurement of segment information and disclosures. Specifically, it requires a firm to provide financial and descriptive information about its reportable segments – the operating segments or aggregations of operating segments based on which the senior management of the firm (the "chief operating decision maker") regularly evaluates separate financial information in deciding how to allocate resources and how to assess performance. Generally, under IFRS 8, the information to be reported will be the same information that is used internally, which might differ from amounts reported in the financial statements. The new standard therefore requires an explanation of the basis on which the segment information is prepared, and reconciliations to the amounts presented in the income statement and the balance sheet. UBS is currently assessing the impact of IFRS 8 on the structure and content of the segment reporting in its ­financial statements, and whether, as permitted by the standard, to apply it from 1 January 2008.

IFRIC 7 Applying the Restatement Approach under IAS 29 Financial Reporting in Hyperinflationary Economies will be applied on 1 January 2007. This Interpretation provides guidance on how to apply the requirements of IAS 29 in a reporting period in which an entity (this could be a subsidiary) identifies the existence of hyperinflation in the economy of its functional currency, when that economy was not hyperinflationary in the prior period, and the entity therefore ­restates its financial statements in accordance with IAS 29. It is not expected that this guidance will have an impact on UBS's ­Financial Statements.

IFRIC 8 Scope of IFRS 2

IFRIC 8 was issued in January 2006. This IFRIC addresses whether IFRS 2 applies to transactions in which the entity cannot identify specifically some or all of the goods or services received. The Interpretation requires that IFRS 2 be applied to transactions in which goods or services are received, such as transactions in which an entity receives goods or services as consideration for equity instruments of the entity. This includes transactions in which the entity cannot identify specifically some or all of the goods or services received. The unidentifiable goods or services received (or to be received) should be measured as the difference between the fair value of the share-based payment and the fair value of any identifiable goods or services received (or to be received). Measurement of the unidentifiable goods or services received should take place at the grant date. However, for cash-­settled transactions, the liability should be re-measured at each reporting date until it is settled. UBS will adopt the ­Interpretation on 1 January 2007. This Interpretation will have no significant impact on UBS's Financial Statements.

IFRIC 9 Reassessment of Embedded Derivatives

The Interpretation clarifies that an entity should not reassess whether an embedded derivative needs to be separated from the host contract after the initial hybrid contract is recognized, unless there is a change in the terms of the contract that significantly modifies the cash flows that otherwise would be required under the contract, in which case reassessment is required. UBS will adopt this Interpretation of IAS 39 on 1 January 2007. It is not expected that this Interpretation will have a significant impact on UBS's Financial Statements.

IFRIC 10, Interim Financial Reporting and Impairment

The new Interpretation of IAS 39 requires that impairment losses recognized in a previous interim period in respect of goodwill or an investment in either an equity instrument or a financial asset carried at cost must not be reversed at a subsequent balance sheet date.UBS will adopt this Inter­pretation from 1 January 2007 onwards. It is not expected that this interpretation will have a significant impact on UBS's Financial Statements.

IFRIC 11, IFRS 2: Group and Treasury Share Transactions

IFRIC 11 was issued in November 2006 and provides guidance on (a) how to account for share-based payment arrangements between entities within the same group; (b) determining whether a transaction should be accounted for as equity-settled or cash-settled when an entity either chooses or is required to buy equity instruments (i.e. treasury shares) from another party, to satisfy its obligations to its employees; and (c) determining whether a transaction should be accounted for as equity-settled or cash-settled when an entity's employees are granted rights to equity instruments of the entity (e.g. share options), either by the entity itself or by its shareholders, and the shareholders of the entity provide the equity instruments needed. The Interpretation requires that share-based payment transactions in which an entity receives services as consideration for its own equity instruments be accounted for as an equity-settled transaction. This applies regardless of whether the entity chooses or is required to buy those equity instruments from another party to satisfy its obligations to its employees under the share-based payment arrangement. UBS will adopt the interpretation on 1 January 2007. It is not expected to have a significant impact on UBS's Financial Statements.