Differences from NYSE standards
According to Rule 303A.11 of the NYSE Corporate Governance listing standards, foreign private issuers have to disclose any significant ways in which their corporate governance practices differ from those to be followed by domestic companies. The UBS Board of Directors has determined the following differences:
For US listed companies the NYSE rules require:
– Responsibility of the Audit Committee for appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the Independent Auditors.
UBS’s Audit Committee has been assigned all these responsibilities, except for appointment of the Independent Auditors, which – according to Swiss Company Law – is required to be voted upon by shareholders. The Audit Committee assesses the performance and qualification of the External Auditors and submits its proposal for appointment, re-appointment or removal to the full Board, which brings this proposal to the shareholders for vote at the Annual General Meeting (AGM).
– Discussion of risk assessment and risk management policies by Audit Committee.
UBS, as a global financial services firm, has a sophisticated and complex system of risk management and control. Risk management and control is the clear responsibility of the business. The Board of Directors, of which the Audit Committee members are part, has authority to define the firm’s risk principles and its risk capacity. The Chairman’s Office, acting as Risk Committee on behalf of the full Board, is responsible for monitoring the adherence to the defined risk principles and for reviewing whether the business and control units run appropriate systems for the management and control of risks. The Audit Committee is regularly updated by Group Internal Audit on specific risk issues.
– Assistance by Audit Committee of the internal audit function.
In accordance with the Swiss Federal Banking Commission’s Circular Letter on Internal Audit, dated 14 December 1995, UBS gave the Chairman’s Office responsibility and authority for supervising the internal audit function. The complexity of the financial services industry requires in-depth knowledge to allow for an effective supervision of the internal audit function. The Chairman’s Office reports back to the full Board on all important findings, and the Audit Committee is regularly updated directly by the head of Group Internal Audit.
– Responsibility of the Nominating Committee for oversight of management and Board evaluation.
Management evaluation (performance of the Group CEO and the members of the Group Executive Board) is done by the Chairman’s Office and reported to the full Board. All Board Committees perform a self-assessment of their activities and report back to the full Board. The Board has direct responsibility and authority to evaluate its own performance, without preparation by a Board Committee.
– Proxy statement reports of the Audit and Compensation Committees.
Under Swiss Company Law, all reports addressed to shareholders are provided and signed by the full Board, which has ultimate responsibility vis-à-vis shareholders. The Committees submit their reports to the full Board.
– Shareholders’ votes on equity compensation plans.
Under Swiss Company Law, the approval of compensation plans is not within the authority of the AGM, but of the Board of Directors. The reason for this approach is the fact that the capital of a Swiss company is determined in the Articles of Association and, therefore, each increase of capital has to be submitted for shareholders’ approval. If equity-based compensation plans result in a need for a capital increase, AGM approval is mandatory. If, however, shares for such plans are purchased in the market, shareholders do not have the authority to vote on their approval.
– Non-management directors to meet at least once per year separately, without any directors participating who are not independent because of their employment by the company.
Under Swiss Banking Laws Board members are not allowed to assume any day-to-day management responsibility. UBS therefore considers all its Board members as “non-management directors”, despite the fact that three “executive” Board members perform their mandate on a full-time basis and are remunerated by the company for their services. The Board meets regularly without executive management, but including the three executive Board members.
The New York Stock Exchange has published new forms for the annual and interim written affirmation required under Section 303A.12 (c) of the NYSE Corporate Governance listing standards. NYSE-listed foreign private issuers are required to submit an annual written affirmation and accompanying exhibits to the NYSE, certifying that it is in compliance with the NYSE corporate governance requirements applicable to foreign private issuers – specifically the audit committee requirements and the requirement to provide a statement of significant corporate governance differences. NYSE-listed foreign private issuers have become subject to these requirements as of 31 July 2005. UBS filed the requested affirmation forms and exhibits in mid-July 2005.
From now on, the annual written affirmation will have to be submitted no later than 30 days after filing the annual report on Form 20-F with the SEC.