Compensation Committee activities
The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors consists of three independent external directors: Rolf A. Meyer, chairman, Sir Peter Davis and Peter Spuhler. For additional information – activities, mandate, meetings – see page 108 of the Handbook. For its activities the Committee relies on comprehensive background documentation provided by internal human resources specialists as well as by the Group Controller. During 2005, the Compensation Committee did not appoint any external compensation consultants, but used internal and external compensation surveys and intelligence provided by compensation specialists. The Chairman of the Committee participates in external international seminars for compensation professionals. The Committee makes its decisions on individual compensation for the executive Vice Chairmen, the Group CEO and the members of the GEB considering individual performance and personal contributions of each member, market data of competitors, actual compensation in prior periods as well as the assessment submitted by the Chairman of the Board. It also takes into consideration the proposals made by the Group CEO when it makes compensation decisions for GEB members. For its decision on the Chairman’s compensation, the Committee relies on the annual assessment performed by the full Board and its own judgement of performance and contributions as well as comparisons with pay levels for comparable functions outside UBS.
The Committee, as a basis for its decisions, performed the following activities during the year:
– Best practice review of compensation design, pay mix and disclosure: Generally, nine key competitors are considered as the most relevant labour market for senior executive compensation. The peer group comprises Bear Stearns, Citigroup, Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank, Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan Chase, Lehman Brothers, Merrill Lynch and Morgan Stanley. For certain positions, additional peers are taken into account, as appropriate. This review compiles publicly available data on our key competitors from US proxy statements and other filings as well as data provided by compensation consultants in order to develop a perspective on common as well as best practice amongst our key competitors. UBS’s compensation systems compare favorably with these nine key competitors, and are specifically tailored to support the achievement of UBS’s strategic objectives. Among other components, UBS’s compensation framework includes several shareholder friendly features such as share ownership requirements, premium-priced options (at a strike price of 110%), stringent forfeiture rules and no severance packages.
– Review of competitive pay and performance: The numbers for 2004 show that UBS’s senior executive compensation levels are well positioned relative to the market. The above-mentioned nine competitors paid total compensation between CHF 16 million and 32 million to their Chairmen and / or CEOs in 2004. Median pay for the Chairmen and / or CEOs of this group of competitors was CHF 24 million for 2004, the second highest value stood at CHF 30 million. These numbers normally include base salaries, cash bonus and the fair value of equity-based awards.
– Review of Compensation Plan Rules: The Compensation Committee annually performs a review of the Compensation Plan Rules for senior executives. It ensures that shareholders’ interests are carefully taken into consideration and that the plan design provides appropriate incentives for long-term value creation.
The Committee also regularly reviews the individual employment contracts of senior executives. These contracts provide for a general notice period of twelve months, during which the senior executive is entitled to receive salary and pro-rata incentives, unless he has been terminated for cause. Shares and options that have not vested at the time of termination may be subject to forfeiture, mainly if the senior executive is joining a competitor.
The Compensation Committee has drawn up special employment agreements for the Chairman of the Board and the Executive Vice Chairmen, due to the fact that they are appointed by the shareholders for a three-year term of office and may be dismissed by a shareholders’ vote only, but cannot otherwise be terminated. In addition, the reorganization of the Wealth Management US business also required the Compensation Committee to draw up a special employment agreement for a GEB member. These circumstances call for special provisions, mainly in respect of termination of employment. The general rule of a twelve-month notice period for senior executives, however, is maintained.
Neither the GEB employment contracts nor the contracts for the executive Board members provide for additional severance payment in case of termination.