UBS AG
Screenreader-optimized Version for visually impaired and blind visitors Home | Accessibility | Zoom version | Local Sitemap | Service Finder | Search
   
Quarterly Reporting  
     
At a Glance
Financial Businesses
Industrial Holdings
Balance Sheet & Capital Management
Financial Statements
UBS Registered Shares
Contacts
 

Global Asset Management
Global Asset Management

Investment capabilities and performance
Investment capabilities and performance

Our actively managed Global Equity composite under­performed its benchmark in the quarter, largely due to weak stock selection in the banking, technology and consumer sectors and an underweight position in materials. This was partly offset by good stock selection in healthcare and ­insurance.

Regional equity performance for the quarter was varied. The US equity and US equity 130-30 long-short strategies underperformed, largely due to unfavorable stock selection, particularly in the banking sector. UK, European and Japanese equity performances were also behind benchmarks, while Asian, Australian, emerging markets and small caps outperformed, driven by strong stock selection.

All growth equity capabilities had strong absolute and relative returns versus their respective benchmarks in first quarter.

At the end of the quarter, yields in developed fixed income markets were either largely unchanged or modestly higher from the beginning of the year. Parts of the structured credit market, however, suffered from concerns related to the US mortgage securities market. This outweighed the positive impact on performance from active interest rate positioning as it negatively affected the relative returns of a number of active bond strategies in the US, as well as the Absolute Return Bond strategy.

Balanced (multi-asset) portfolios generally underperformed their benchmarks over the quarter. Asset allocation was broadly flat to slightly negative in terms of performance contribution. The overweight stance towards US equities and an underweighting of Australian and Continental European equities detracted from performance. The overweighting of Netherlands equities and an underweight stance in bonds positively contributed to performance.

Currency strategies were a drag on performance in balanced strategies for the quarter.

Our main absolute return portfolios, the Dynamic Alpha Strategies, were broadly flat on the quarter. The positive stance toward equities and short position toward bonds positively contributed to returns. However, this was offset by currency and security selection.

Alternative and quantitative investments performed well in first quarter. The O'Connor single manager funds produced positive returns across the majority of their strategies as a result of the low correlation to equity and bond markets. The multi-manager platform also achieved positive performance across its core hedge fund of funds offerings during the quarter. Invested assets for alternative and quantitative investments grew by 7% during the quarter, driven by performance and the continued diversification of capabilities.

Global real estate saw continued growth in assets on the back of favorable market conditions in first quarter. Invested assets in our real estate security funds increased by some 44%. Performance in real estate security funds remained solid. Outperformance was achieved on the back of positive country and stock selection while the European and Australian real estate security funds benefited from favorable stock allocation. Our private real estate funds, in particular the USbased direct investment funds, again provided solid returns during the quarter.

Annualized

Composite

1 year

3 years

5 years

10 years

Global Equity Composite vs. MSCI World Equity (Free) Index

+

Global Bond Composite vs. Citigroup World Government Bond Index

Global Securities Composite vs. Global Securities Markets Index

+

+

+

US Large Cap Select Growth Equity Composite vs. Russell 1000 Growth Index

+ 1

+ 1

N/A

US Large Cap Equity Composite vs. Russell 1000 Index

+

+

+

Global Real Estate Securities (hedged in CHF) 2 vs. FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global Real Estate Index (hedged in CHF) 3

+

+

+ 3

+ 2,3

(+) above benchmark; (–) under benchmark; (=) equal to benchmark. All are after fees. A composite is an aggregation of one or more portfolios in a single group that is representative of a particular strategy, style, or objective. The composite is the asset-weighted average of the performance results of all the portfolios it holds.

1 Performance data for 3 and 5 years is for UBS AG, NY Branch Large Cap Select Growth Composite, which is managed in a substantially similar manner to the US Large Cap Select Growth Equity Composite. 2 Composite figures since 31 December 1999. For 10-year annualized returns the Investment Group UBS AST Immobilien Ausland is used as the performance reference (inception: 9 May 1990). 3 Prior to April 2004, the reference index is the GPR General Index Europe (CHF, unhedged) and thereafter it is linked to the benchmark FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global Real Estate Index (total return, hedged into CHF) to calculate 3-, 5- and 10-year returns. Reference index returns are provided for reference purposes only. From 31 March 2004 to 30 September 2005 returns for the FTSE EPRA/ NAREIT Global Real Estate Index hedged into Swiss francs are based on published data, while currency translation and hedging into Swiss francs are calculated internally. Thereafter, UBS has contracted with FTSE, the index provider, to provide on a customized request basis, Swiss franc hedged returns for the FTSE EPRA/ NAREIT Global Real Estate Index.

Pension fund solutions

In the past, running a pension fund seemed like a relatively straightforward proposition. Contributions were invested in the equity and bond markets and then dutifully administered. After thirty years or so, when an employee retired, the money had grown sufficiently to finance the promised benefits. When market volatility caused asset and liability values to diverge, it was assumed that the passage of time would help to narrow any gaps. In rising equity markets, the pension fund might even have earned some additional money above and beyond its obligations to retirees.

Now, declining interest rates, increasing life expectancy and the growing cost of servicing pension funds have resulted in the value of the liabilities of many corporate pension plans significantly increasing in relative size. In some cases, they even dwarf the market value of the companies themselves. Also, regulatory changes in many countries have increased the focus on the short-term financial health of plans, increasingly imposing corrective actions if a plan's funding ratio (the ratio of plan assets to its liabilities) deteriorates significantly. Compounding matters, the relatively low level of interest rates in the past five years has raised liability valuations (liability values move inversely to interest rates), while the equity market volatility of the late 1990s and early 2000s has created widespread awareness that many plans are overly reliant on equity market returns.

Of course, corporations always have the option to place more money into the plan whenever needed to improve the funding ratio. But this approach can be expensive and, for some com-panies, simply not financially viable. As a result, pension funds are looking for ways to better manage their funding ratios and the associated risk. UBS has recognized and responded to this by developing a sophisticated investment approach to help clients meet the current challenges. In simple terms, this means buying assets that generate the returns needed to pay out employee retirement benefits while still carefully managing the risks of shorter-term fluctuations in plan funding ratios. Pension strategies need to be designed and managed in conjunction with plan liabilities, taking into account the plan's structure, its projected outflows, and the valuation of liabilities under changing accounting rules.

Understanding the specific objectives and risk tolerance of each plan is critical. These are affected by the funding ratio, as well as other factors, such as the maturity of the plan or the corporation's ability and willingness to contribute additional money. Based on these factors, the next step is to design solutions that better meet the plan's goal by efficiently taking risks relative to the plan's liabilities. Typically this is done by utilizing sophisticated interest rate and inflation management techniques to better align asset and liability returns, while at the same time improving the structure and diversification of the asset portfolio. The asset management business calls this approach Asset Liability Investment Solutions (ALIS). The ALIS team is staffed by former pension plan representatives, pension consultants, actuaries, derivatives experts as well as a broad group of investment specialists. It is one of many components of the collaborative, cross-functional global pension initiative that UBS currently has in place, allowing it to bring to bear a wealth of expertise and resources to help sponsors and trustees measure, analyze, manage and implement a variety of pension solutions – and to adapt to the changing environment in which they operate.

Terms of Use | Privacy Statement

Products and services in these webpages may not be available for residents of certain nations. Please consult the sales restrictions relating to the service in question for further information.

© UBS 1998-2009. All rights reserved.

 
Search only in
Q1 2007 
Search
Create your own report 
Create your own report

Create your own report by searching and selecting articles of our quarterly reports.
Your selection will be compiled into a single PDF-file.