Market risk is incurred primarily through UBS’s trading activities,
which are centered in the Investment Bank but also arise,
to a much lesser extent, in the wealth management businesses.
Our treasury department also assumes market risk as a
result of its balance sheet and capital management responsibilities.
The first quarter started actively as the US dollar rallied
against other currencies, equity markets rose and credit
spreads continued to tighten. The buoyant markets supported
a high level of mergers and acquisitions and new equity
issuance. Oil prices increased in the period, driven by continued
strong demand and concerns about inventory levels. The
US Federal Reserve raised its funding rate target twice, but
although both increases were widely expected, the hawkish
comments on inflation that accompanied the second pushed
up long-term rates and led to a steepening of the US dollar
yield curve.
March saw disappointing returns on investment grade
credits, with credit spreads finally widening from the
seven-year lows reached during the quarter. In the foreign
exchange markets, the US dollar gave up some of its earlier
gains but still ended the quarter higher than at the end of
2004.
Market risk for the Investment Bank, as measured by the
average 10-day 99% VaR, was CHF 371 million in first quarter
2005, slightly up from CHF 358 million in the previous
quarter. We took advantage of the positive, active markets at
the beginning of the quarter, with 10-day VaR peaking at
CHF 517 million in early February, as can be seen in the backtesting
chart above. Interest rate VaR, which
reached its maximum of CHF 526 million at that point, was
the main contributor, with exposures to the US markets being
a significant driver. We reduced risk in anticipation of more
negative sentiment towards the end of February, and 10-day
VaR remained in a narrow range of CHF 300 million to CHF
350 million until late March. Renewed proprietary positions
at the end of the quarter led to an increase in equities VaR,
which had been fairly flat up to that point. Investment Bank
VaR ended the quarter at CHF 392 million, compared to CHF
332 million at the end of the previous quarter.
Backtesting compares actual revenues arising from closing
positions (i.e. excluding intra-day revenues, fees and commissions)
with the 1-day VaR calculated on these positions, and
is used to monitor the quality of the VaR model. The above graph
shows these daily backtesting revenues and
the corresponding 1-day VaR over the last 12 months. The 10-day VaR, which is the basis of the limits and exposures in the
tables above, is also shown in this graph for information.
Revenue volatility over the period was within the range
predicted by the VaR model.
We also routinely assess and actively manage and control
tail risks against a standard set of forward-looking scenarios
supplemented by specific scenarios targeting individual sectors
or reflecting current concerns, such as widening credit
spreads or increased energy market volatility. Stress events
modeled in our standard scenarios include crises in equity, corporate
bond and emerging markets, and severe movements
in currency, interest rate and energy markets. These scenarios
are reviewed regularly and fine-tuned as necessary. Stress
loss exposure ended the quarter higher than last quarter but
the average was lower.
VaR and stress measures control our overall portfolio exposure
but we also apply concentration controls on exposure
to individual market risk variables, such as individual equity
markets, currency, interest and foreign exchange rates, and
single name issuers. The diversification of risks and avoidance
of undue concentrations remain key pillars of our risk control
process.